AK-MCS: An active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo Simulation

被引:1997
作者
Echard, B. [1 ]
Gayton, N. [1 ]
Lemaire, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Clermont Ferrand, Inst Francais Mecan Avancee, EA Lab Mecan & Ingenieries 3867, F-63000 Clermont Ferrand, France
关键词
Reliability; Metamodel; Kriging; Active learning; Monte Carlo; Failure probability; COMPLEX COMPUTER CODES; OPTIMIZATION; DESIGNS;
D O I
10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.01.002
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
081407 [建筑环境与能源工程];
摘要
An important challenge in structural reliability is to keep to a minimum the number of calls to the numerical models. Engineering problems involve more and more complex computer codes and the evaluation of the probability of failure may require very time-consuming computations. Metamodels are used to reduce these computation times. To assess reliability, the most popular approach remains the numerous variants of response surfaces. Polynomial Chaos [1] and Support Vector Machine [2] are also possibilities and have gained considerations among researchers in the last decades. However, recently, Kriging, originated from geostatistics, have emerged in reliability analysis. Widespread in optimisation, Kriging has just started to appear in uncertainty propagation [3] and reliability [4,5] studies. It presents interesting characteristics such as exact interpolation and a local index of uncertainty on the prediction which can be used in active learning methods. The aim of this paper is to propose an iterative approach based on Monte Carlo Simulation and Kriging metamodel to assess the reliability of structures in a more efficient way. The method is called AK-MCS for Active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo Simulation. It is shown to be very efficient as the probability of failure obtained with AK-MCS is very accurate and this, for only a small number of calls to the performance function. Several examples from literature are performed to illustrate the methodology and to prove its efficiency particularly for problems dealing with high non-linearity, non-differentiability, non-convex and non-connex domains of failure and high dimensionality. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 154
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2002, IMMREP200213 TU DENM
[2]
[Anonymous], ICASP 10 APPL STAT P
[3]
Application of subset simulation methods to reliability benchmark problems [J].
Au, S. K. ;
Ching, J. ;
Beck, J. L. .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2007, 29 (03) :183-193
[4]
Efficient Global Reliability Analysis for Nonlinear Implicit Performance Functions [J].
Bichon, B. J. ;
Eldred, M. S. ;
Swiler, L. P. ;
Mahadevan, S. ;
McFarland, J. M. .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2008, 46 (10) :2459-2468
[5]
An adaptive algorithm to build up sparse polynomial chaos expansions for stochastic finite element analysis [J].
Blatman, Geraud ;
Sudret, Bruno .
PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2010, 25 (02) :183-197
[6]
Cox DD, 1997, SIAM PROC S, P315
[7]
Kriging metamodel management in the design optimization of a CNG injection system [J].
Dellino, G. ;
Lino, P. ;
Meloni, C. ;
Rizzo, A. .
MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN SIMULATION, 2009, 79 (08) :2345-2360
[8]
Ditlevsen O., 1996, STRUCTURAL RELIABILI
[9]
CQ2RS: a new statistical approach to the response surface method for reliability analysis [J].
Gayton, N ;
Bourinet, JM ;
Lemaire, M .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2003, 25 (01) :99-121
[10]
Ghanem R., 1991, STOCHASTIC FINITE EL, VVolume 1, P1, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4612-3094-6, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4612-3094-6]