Coding mammograms using the classification "probably benign finding - Short interval follow-up suggested"

被引:33
作者
Caplan, LS
Blackman, D
Nadel, M
Monticciolo, DL
机构
[1] Natl Ctr Chron Dis Prevent & Hlth Promot, Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Epidemiol & Hlth Serv Res Branch, Atlanta, GA 30341 USA
[2] Emory Clin, Breast Imaging Ctr, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.172.2.9930778
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. Many benign breast lesions revealed by mammography show features indicating that the lesions have a high, but not complete, likelihood of being benign. The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) allows radiologists to classify these mammograms as "probably benign finding-short interval follow-up suggested" (category 3). We explored whether certain factors are associated with the use of category 3 in a national cancer detection program. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We analyzed data from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, a comprehensive nationwide program that provides cancer screening for low-income and medically underserved women. The study population included all women at least 40 years old who had undergone mammography on or before September 30, 1996 (n = 372,760). RESULTS. Of the 372,760 mammograms, 7.7% were classified as category 3. The probability of receiving a category 3 classification decreased as patients' ages increased. Women who were symptomatic were nearly twice as likely as women who were asymptomatic to receive a category 3 classification, and women whose clinical breast examinations had abnormal findings were more than twice as likely as women with examinations having normal findings to receive a category 3 classification. The percentage of mammograms classified as category 3 by state or tribal organization ranged from 1.4% to 14.0%. CONCLUSION. Several patient variables, including patient symptomatology, were associated with the probability of having a mammogram classified as category 3. One of the most important determinants was where the patient underwent mammography, which suggests that variability exists among radiologists themselves in using this BI-RADS code for "probably benign" mammographic lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 342
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   NONPALPABLE, PROBABLY BENIGN BREAST-LESIONS - FOLLOW-UP STRATEGIES AFTER INITIAL DETECTION ON MAMMOGRAPHY [J].
ADLER, DD ;
HELVIE, MA ;
IKEDA, DM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1990, 155 (06) :1195-1201
[2]  
*AM COLL RAD, 1993, BREAST IM REP DAT SY
[3]   ACCEPTABILITY OF PERIODIC FOLLOW-UP AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO BIOPSY FOR MAMMOGRAPHICALLY DETECTED LESIONS INTERPRETED AS PROBABLY BENIGN [J].
BRENNER, RJ ;
SICKLES, EA .
RADIOLOGY, 1989, 171 (03) :645-646
[4]  
DENEEF P, 1991, WESTERN J MED, V154, P36
[5]   MAMMOGRAPHIC FOLLOW-UP OF LOW-SUSPICION LESIONS - COMPLIANCE RATE AND DIAGNOSTIC YIELD [J].
HELVIE, MA ;
PENNES, DR ;
REBNER, M ;
ADLER, DD .
RADIOLOGY, 1991, 178 (01) :155-158
[6]  
Henson R M, 1996, J Public Health Manag Pract, V2, P36
[7]  
Herrera J. L., 1993, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, V42, P1
[8]  
HINDLE WH, 1992, WESTERN J MED, V157, P152
[9]   DETECTION OF BREAST-CANCER IN YOUNG-WOMEN [J].
LESNICK, GJ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1977, 237 (10) :967-969
[10]  
MANN BD, 1983, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V118, P23