The prevalence of elder abuse and neglect: a systematic review

被引:377
作者
Cooper, Claudia [1 ]
Selwood, Amber [2 ]
Livingston, Gill [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Camden & Islington Mental Hlth & Social Care Trus, London WC1E 6BT, England
[2] UCL, NE London Mental Hlth Trust, London WC1E 6BT, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
elders; abuse; prevalence;
D O I
10.1093/ageing/afm194
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objective: to perform a systematic review of studies measuring the prevalence of elder abuse or neglect, either reported by older people themselves, or family and professional caregivers or investigated using objective measures. Methods: we conducted a comprehensive literature search of multiple databases up to October 2006, supplemented by a search of the references of all relevant articles. Validity of studies was graded by two authors independently using a standardised checklist. Results: forty-nine studies met our inclusion criteria, of which only seven used measures for which reliability and validity had been assessed. In the general population studies, 6% of older people reported significant abuse in the last month and 5.6% of couples reported physical violence in their relationship in the last year. In studies using valid instruments involving vulnerable elders, nearly a quarter reported significant levels of psychological abuse. Five per cent of family caregivers reported physical abuse towards care recipients with dementia in a year, and a third reported any significant abuse. Sixteen per cent of care home staff admitted significant psychological abuse. Rates of abuse recorded using objective measures (5%) or reported to home management or adult protective services (APS) (12%) were low. Conclusion: one in four vulnerable elders are at risk of abuse and only a small proportion of this is currently detected. Elders and family and professional caregivers are willing to report abuse and should be asked about it routinely. Valid, reliable measures and consensus on what constitutes an adequate standard for validity of abuse measures are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 160
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Risk factors for potentially harmful informal caregiver behavior [J].
Beach, SR ;
Schulz, R ;
Williamson, GM ;
Miller, LS ;
Weiner, MF ;
Lance, CE .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2005, 53 (02) :255-261
[2]  
Boyle MH, 1998, Evidence-Based Mental Health, V1, P37, DOI DOI 10.1136/EBMH.1.2.37
[3]   Factors associated with self-reported elder mistreatment in Iowa's frailest elders [J].
Buri, Hilary ;
Daly, Jeanette M. ;
Hartz, Arthur J. ;
Jogerst, Gerald J. .
RESEARCH ON AGING, 2006, 28 (05) :562-581
[4]   Elder Mistreatment in Urban India: A Community Based Study [J].
Chokkanathan, Srinivasan ;
Lee, Alex .
JOURNAL OF ELDER ABUSE & NEGLECT, 2005, 17 (02) :45-61
[5]   Elder abuse in the community: Prevalence and consequences [J].
Comijs, HC ;
Pot, AM ;
Smit, JH ;
Bouter, LM ;
Jonker, C .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1998, 46 (07) :885-888
[6]  
Compton SA, 1997, INT J GERIATR PSYCH, V12, P632, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1166(199706)12:6<632::AID-GPS570>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-9
[8]  
COOPER C, 2007, IN PRESS IN J GERIAT
[9]   Indicators of elder abuse:: A crossnational comparison of psychiatric morbidity and other determinants in the Ad-HOC study [J].
Cooper, Claudia ;
Katona, Cornelius ;
Finne-Soveri, Harriet ;
Topinkova, Eva ;
Carpenter, G. Iain ;
Livingston, Gill .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 14 (06) :489-497
[10]  
Department of Health, 2000, NO SECR GUID DEV IMP