Glycemic control continues to deteriorate after sulfonylureas are added to metformin among patients with type 2 diabetes

被引:129
作者
Cook, MN
Girman, CJ
Stein, PP
Alexander, CM
Holman, RR
机构
[1] Merck, Dept Epidemiol, Merck Res Labs, West Point, PA 19486 USA
[2] Merck, Merck Res Labs, Dept Clin Res Metab, Rahway, NJ USA
[3] Merck, Dept Outcomes Res & Management, West Point, PA USA
[4] Univ Oxford, Oxford Ctr Diab Endocrinol & Metab, Oxford, England
关键词
D O I
10.2337/diacare.28.5.995
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE - To describe the course and predictors of glycemic Control among patients 14 With type 2 diabetes after sulfonylureas (SUs) are added to metformin (MF). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Patients (n = 2,220) treated With MF monotherapy for > 90 days before initiating MF plus SU combination therapy between January 1998 and March 2004 were Studied in a retrospective analysis Of electronic medical records from U.K. primary care practices using the General Practice Research Database. Median glycoslyated hemoglobin, A(1c)(AIC) before and after SU initiation was described,and patient characteristics were evaluated as predictors Of time until A1C >= 8.0% glucose-lowering therapy was intensified (by starting insulin or adding a third oral -,agent). RESULTS - At months post-SU initiation, median A1C resumed deteriorating at a some what comparable rate to that observed on MF monotherapy. Higher pre-SUA1C, younger age, female sex, shorter diabetes duration, higher serum creatinine, and being an ex-smoker predicted time until A1C >= 8.0% or glucose-lowering therapy was intensified in various analyses. Median A1C was 9.5% when therapy was unensifred. A1C >= 8.0%,was estimated to occur in 85% of patients 4 yearsafter SU initiation and in 68% 4 years after initially achieving, A1C < 7% on MF Plus SU therapy. CONCLUSIONS - In this population, glycentic control is improved following the addition of SUs to MF, but deterioration resumes is carly as 6 months.The high proportion of patients remaining on MF plus SU therapy despite having A1C >= 8.0% suggests that there are significant barriers to starting insulin or adding a third agent when treatment goals are not achieved with this combination.
引用
收藏
页码:995 / 1000
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] *AM DIAB ASS, 2004, DIABETES CARE S1, V27, pS15
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1995, Diabetes, V44, P1249
  • [3] Utilization of oral hypoglycemic agents in a drug-insured US population
    Boccuzzi, SJ
    Wogen, J
    Fox, J
    Sung, JCY
    Shah, AB
    Kim, J
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2001, 24 (08) : 1411 - 1415
  • [4] The burden of treatment failure in type 2 diabetes
    Brown, JB
    Nichols, GA
    Perry, A
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2004, 27 (07) : 1535 - 1540
  • [5] Brown JB, 2003, AM J MANAG CARE, V9, P213
  • [6] Davis S, 2003, PHARMACOEPIDEM DR S, V12, pS61
  • [7] Changes in treatment after the start of oral hypoglycaemic therapy in Type 2 diabetes: a population-based study
    Donnan, PT
    Steinke, DT
    Newton, RW
    Morris, AD
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2002, 19 (07) : 606 - 610
  • [8] EDWARDS G, 2003, AM DIAB ASS ANN M
  • [9] SECONDARY FAILURE TO TREATMENT WITH ORAL ANTIDIABETIC AGENTS IN NON-INSULIN-DEPENDENT DIABETES
    GROOP, LC
    PELKONEN, R
    KOSKIMIES, S
    BOTTAZZO, GF
    DONIACH, D
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 1986, 9 (02) : 129 - 133
  • [10] One-year glycemic control with a sulfonylurea plus pioglitazone versus a sulfonylurea plus metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes
    Hanefeld, M
    Brunetti, P
    Schernthaner, GH
    Matthews, DR
    Charbonnel, BH
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2004, 27 (01) : 141 - 147