Measuring unfair (in)equality

被引:59
作者
Almas, Ingvild [1 ,2 ]
Cappelen, Alexander W. [1 ]
Lind, Jo Thori [2 ]
Sorensen, Erik O. [1 ]
Tungodden, Bertil [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Sch Econ & Business Adm, N-5035 Bergen, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
[3] Chr Michelsen Inst, Bergen, Norway
关键词
Income inequality; Fairness; RESPONSIBILITY; REDISTRIBUTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper shows one way of generalizing the standard framework of inequality measurement to allow for a distinction between fair and unfair inequalities. We introduce the unfairness Lorenz curve and the unfairness Gini, which are generalizations of the standard versions of the Lorenz curve and the Gini. With this more general framework in place, we study the implications of responsibility-sensitive theories of justice for the evaluation of the income distribution in Norway from 1986 to 2005. We find that both the pre-tax and the post-tax income distributions have become less fair in Norway, even though the standard Gini for the pre-tax income distribution has decreased in the same period. Two trends explain this development: the increase in income share of the top percentile and the change in the situation of females in the labor market. The concentration of income at the top of the distribution contributes both to increased unfairness and increased inequality, whereas the increase in females' working hours and level of education primarily contributes to a reduction in inequality. Thus, the latter effect dominates for the standard Gini and the former effect for the unfairness Gini. Furthermore, we find that the increase in post-tax unfairness is even larger than the increase in pre-tax unfairness, which shows that the tax system in Norway contributes less to eliminating unfairness in 2005 than in 1986. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:488 / 499
页数:12
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], POLITICS PHILOS EC
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2008, Fairness, Responsibility and Welfare
  • [3] [Anonymous], PHILOS STUDIES
  • [4] Top Incomes in the Long Run of History
    Atkinson, Anthony B.
    Piketty, Thomas
    Saez, Emmanuel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2011, 49 (01) : 3 - 71
  • [5] The return to schooling in structural dynamic models: a survey
    Belzil, Christian
    [J]. EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2007, 51 (05) : 1059 - 1105
  • [6] Small Family, Smart Family? Family Size and the IQ Scores of Young Men
    Black, Sandra E.
    Devereux, Paul J.
    Salvanes, Kjell G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES, 2010, 45 (01) : 33 - 58
  • [7] Bossert W, 1996, SOC CHOICE WELFARE, V13, P343
  • [8] REDISTRIBUTION MECHANISMS BASED ON INDIVIDUAL CHARACTERISTICS
    BOSSERT, W
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL SOCIAL SCIENCES, 1995, 29 (01) : 1 - 17
  • [9] Inequality of opportunity in Brazil
    Bourguignon, Francois
    Ferreira, Francisco H. G.
    Menendez, Marta
    [J]. REVIEW OF INCOME AND WEALTH, 2007, 53 (04) : 585 - 618
  • [10] CAPPELEN A, 2010, FAIRNESS PROPORTIONA