Informed choice in women attending private clinics to undergo first-trimester screening for Down syndrome

被引:48
作者
Jaques, AM
Sheffield, LJ
Halliday, JL
机构
[1] Royal Childrens Hosp, Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Dept Paediat, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
[3] Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Genet Hlth Serv Victoria, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
关键词
informed choice; prenatal screening; Down syndrome; education level; information;
D O I
10.1002/pd.1218
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Objectives Informed choice for prenatal screening has long been considered an essential aspect of service provision, and has been researched extensively in the second trimester. This study aims at examining whether women having first-trimester screening in a private clinic had made an informed choice. Methods A cross-sectional survey recruited women having first-trimester screening at specialist ultrasound practices. Two questionnaires containing a validated Multidimensional Measure of Informed Choice (MMIC) were self-administered pre- and post-screening. Results MMIC was completed by 81% (163/202) of women. Ninety-nine percent of women had a positive attitude towards screening, therefore informed choice was essentially measured on knowledge alone. Pre-screening, 68% made an informed choice, compared with 74% post-screening (chi(2) = 1.6, P = 0.21 (McNernar)). Knowledge was associated with education level, information sources and perception of screening as routine or optional. Conclusions The Australasian Guidelines on prenatal screening state that all women having testing should be provided with written information, and it should be ensured that they have appropriate understanding of the test(s). These guidelines are not being met, even in private clinical care. Health professionals should ensure that all women are provided with suitable information about prenatal screening that is tailored to their level of education and individual needs, and should emphasise that screening is optional. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:656 / 664
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Al-Jader LN, 2000, PRENATAL DIAG, V20, P23, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(200001)20:1<23::AID-PD746>3.0.CO
  • [2] 2-T
  • [3] Gaining informed consent for screening
    Austoker, J
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 319 (7212): : 722 - 723
  • [4] Bekker H, 1999, Health Technol Assess, V3, P1
  • [5] Educating patients about cystic fibrosis carrier screening in a primary care setting
    Bernhardt, BA
    Chase, GA
    Faden, RR
    Geller, G
    Hofman, KJ
    Tambor, ES
    Holtzman, NA
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 1996, 5 (06) : 336 - 340
  • [6] Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review
    Edwards, P
    Roberts, I
    Clarke, M
    DiGuiseppi, C
    Pratap, S
    Wentz, R
    Kwan, I
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 324 (7347): : 1183 - 1185
  • [7] ARE THERE DIFFERENCES IN INFORMATION GIVEN TO PRIVATE AND PUBLIC PRENATAL PATIENTS
    FREDA, MC
    ANDERSEN, HF
    DAMUS, K
    MERKATZ, IR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1993, 169 (01) : 155 - 160
  • [8] Gekas J, 1999, PRENATAL DIAG, V19, P1, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199901)19:1<1::AID-PD456>3.0.CO
  • [9] 2-S
  • [10] Goel V, 1996, PRENATAL DIAG, V16, P425, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199605)16:5<425::AID-PD874>3.3.CO