Cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:46
作者
Rao, Min-Jie [1 ]
Nie, Shao-Ping [1 ]
Xiao, Bao-Wei [1 ]
Zhang, Gong-Heng [1 ]
Gan, Xin-Rong [1 ]
Cao, Sheng-Sheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Peoples Hosp Yichun City, Dept Orthoped, Yichun 336000, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Cervical disc arthroplasty; Anterior cervical discectomy; Meta-analysis; Randomized controlled trial; INVESTIGATIONAL DEVICE EXEMPTION; ADJACENT SEGMENT DISEASE; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; PRODISC-C; MULTICENTER; REPLACEMENT; MINIMUM; SITE; DECOMPRESSION;
D O I
10.1007/s00402-014-2122-5
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
100224 [整形外科学];
摘要
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is the conventional surgical treatment for symptomatic cervical disc disease. Recently, cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) has been developed to address some of the shortcomings associated with ACDF by preserving function of the motion segment. Controversy still surrounds regarding whether CDA is better. We systematically searched six electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Clinical, Ovid, BIOSIS and Cochrane registry of controlled clinical trials) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to April 2014 in which CDA was compared with ACDF for the treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease. Effective data were extracted after the assessment of methodological quality of the trials. Then, we performed the meta-analysis. Eighteen relevant RCTs with a total of 4061 patients were included. The results of the meta-analysis indicated that CDA was superior to ACDF regarding better neurological success (P < 0.00001), greater motion preservation at the operated level (P < 0.00001), fewer secondary surgical procedures (P < 0.00001), and fewer rates of adverse events (P < 0.00001) but inferior to ACDF regarding operative times (P < 0.00001). No significant difference was identified between the two groups regarding blood loss (P = 0.87), lengths of hospital stay (P = 0.76), neck pain scores (P = 0.11) and arm pain scores (P = 0.78) reported on a visual analog scale. The meta-analysis revealed that CDA demonstrated superiorities in better neurological success, greater motion preservation at the operated level, lower rate of adverse events and fewer secondary surgical procedures compared with ACDF. However, the benefits of blood loss, lengths of hospital stay, neck and arm pain functional recovery are still unable to be proved.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 28
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]
Biomechanical comparison of a two-level anterior discectomy and a one-level corpectomy, combined with fusion and anterior plate reconstruction in the cervical spine [J].
Aghayev, Kamran ;
Doulgeris, James J. ;
Gonzalez-Blohm, Sabrina A. ;
Eleraky, Mohammed ;
Lee, William E., III ;
Vrionis, Frank D. .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2014, 29 (01) :21-25
[2]
Clinical relevance of neuroforaminal patency after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion [J].
Brenke, Christopher ;
Dostal, Martin ;
Carolus, Anne ;
Weiss, Christel ;
Radue, Ernst Wilhelm ;
Schmieder, Kirsten ;
Barth, Martin .
ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2014, 156 (06) :1197-1203
[3]
Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc replacement with the Prestige disc: results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial Presented at the 2009 Joint Spine Section Meeting Clinical article [J].
Burkus, J. Kenneth ;
Haid, Regis W., Jr. ;
Traynelis, Vincent C. ;
Mummaneni, Praveen V. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2010, 13 (03) :308-318
[4]
Adjacent Segment Disease After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in a Large Series [J].
Bydon, Mohamad ;
Xu, Risheng ;
Macki, Mohamed ;
De la Garza-Ramos, Rafael ;
Sciubba, Daniel M. ;
Wolinsky, Jean-Paul ;
Witham, Timothy F. ;
Gokaslan, Ziya L. ;
Bydon, Ali .
NEUROSURGERY, 2014, 74 (02) :139-146
[5]
Superiority of the BryanA® Disc Prosthesis for Cervical Myelopathy: A Randomized Study with 3-year Followup [J].
Cheng, Lei ;
Nie, Lin ;
Li, Mu ;
Huo, Yong ;
Pan, Xin .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2011, 469 (12) :3408-3414
[6]
Fusion versus Bryan Cervical Disc in two-level cervical disc disease: a prospective, randomised study [J].
Cheng, Lei ;
Nie, Lin ;
Zhang, Li ;
Hou, Yong .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2009, 33 (05) :1347-1351
[7]
Clinical adjacent-segment pathology after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results after a minimum of 10-year follow-up [J].
Chung, Jae-Yoon ;
Kim, Sung-Kyu ;
Jung, Sung-Taek ;
Lee, Keun-Bae .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 14 (10) :2290-2298
[8]
Prospective randomized study of cervical arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with long-term follow-up: results in 74 patients from a single site Presented at the 2012 Joint Spine Section Meeting Clinical article [J].
Coric, Domagoj ;
Kim, Paul K. ;
Clemente, Jonathan D. ;
Boltes, Margaret O. ;
Nussbaum, Marcy ;
James, Sara .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2013, 18 (01) :36-42
[9]
Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the KineflexIC artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up Clinical article [J].
Coric, Domagoj ;
Nunley, Pierce D. ;
Guyer, Richard D. ;
Musante, David ;
Carmody, Cameron N. ;
Gordon, Charles R. ;
Lauryssen, Carl ;
Ohnmeiss, Donna D. ;
Boltes, Margaret O. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2011, 15 (04) :348-358
[10]
Prospective study of cervical arthroplasty in 98 patients involved in 1 of 3 separate investigational device exemption studies from a single investigational site with a minimum 2-year follow-up [J].
Coric, Domagoj ;
Cassis, Joseph ;
Carew, John D. ;
Boltes, Margaret O. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2010, 13 (06) :715-721