Neoinstitutionalism and e-government - Beyond Jane Fountain

被引:43
作者
Yang, KF [1 ]
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Reubin OD Askew Sch Publ Adm & Policy, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
关键词
e-government; neoinstitutionalism; information technology; change;
D O I
10.1177/0894439303256508
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This article addresses the evolution and implementation of e-government with a neoinstitutional perspective. It starts with a critique on Jane Fountain's technology enactment framework in that the framework fails to show how elected officials, public administrators, and citizens can facilitate e-government toward better democratic governance. This problem reflects the immaturity and ambiguity of neo-institutionalism in accounting for institutional change. The author argues that a balance between agent and institution, between strategic choice and institutional constraint should be maintained in analyzing the evolution of e-government as a long-term institutional change. This balanced approach would give public administration a more optimistic future of e-government.
引用
收藏
页码:432 / 442
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
[2]  
[Anonymous], SCI STUD
[3]  
[Anonymous], J I THEORETICAL EC
[4]  
[Anonymous], HARVARD INT REV
[5]  
[Anonymous], CHINESE PUBLIC ADM R
[6]  
Ayres Clarence E., 1944, THEORY EC PROGR
[7]   What can we learn from the history of technology? [J].
Barley, SR .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 1998, 15 (04) :237-255
[8]   Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution [J].
Barley, SR ;
Tolbert, PS .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 1997, 18 (01) :93-117
[9]  
Bijker WiebeE., 1997, BICYCLES BAKELITES B
[10]   Procedural entrepreneurship: Enacting alternative channels to administrative effectiveness [J].
Brower, RS ;
Abolafia, MY .
AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 1996, 26 (03) :287-308