Two-stage stepup procedures controlling FDR

被引:13
作者
Sarkar, Sanat K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Temple Univ, Dept Stat, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
modified BH procedure; mixture model; average power;
D O I
10.1016/j.jspi.2007.03.058
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
A two-stage stepup procedure is defined and an explicit formula for the FDR of this procedure is derived under any distributional setting. Sets of critical values are determined that provide a control of the FDR of a two-stage stepup procedure under iid mixture model. A class of two-stage FDR procedures modifying the Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) procedure and containing the one given in Storey et al. [2004. Strong control, conservative point estimation and simultanaeous conservative consistency of false discovery rates: a unified approach. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 66, 187-205] is obtained. ne FDR controlling property of the Storey-Taylor-Siegmund procedure is proved only under the independence, which is different from that presented by these authors. A single-stage stepup procedure controlling the FDR under any form of dependence, which is different from and in some situations performs better than the Benjamini-Yekutieli (BY) procedure, is given before discussing how to obtain two-stage versions of the BY and this new procedures. Simulations reveal that procedures proposed in this article under the mixture model can perform quite well in terms of improving the FDR control of the BH procedure. However, the similar idea of improving the FDR control of a stepup procedure under any form dependence does not seem to work. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1072 / 1084
页数:13
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Benjamini Y, 2001, ANN STAT, V29, P1165
[2]   On the adaptive control of the false discovery fate in multiple testing with independent statistics [J].
Benjamini, Y ;
Hochberg, Y .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICS, 2000, 25 (01) :60-83
[3]   CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING [J].
BENJAMINI, Y ;
HOCHBERG, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) :289-300
[4]   Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate [J].
Benjamini, Yoav ;
Krieger, Abba M. ;
Yekutieli, Daniel .
BIOMETRIKA, 2006, 93 (03) :491-507
[5]   Multiple hypothesis testing in microarray experiments [J].
Dudoit, S ;
Shaffer, JP ;
Boldrick, JC .
STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2003, 18 (01) :71-103
[6]  
Finner H, 2001, BIOMETRICAL J, V43, P985, DOI 10.1002/1521-4036(200112)43:8<985::AID-BIMJ985>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-4
[8]   Operating characteristics and extensions of the false discovery rate procedure [J].
Genovese, C ;
Wasserman, L .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2002, 64 :499-517
[9]   MORE POWERFUL PROCEDURES FOR MULTIPLE SIGNIFICANCE TESTING [J].
HOCHBERG, Y ;
BENJAMINI, Y .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1990, 9 (07) :811-818
[10]   False discovery and false nondiscovery rates in single-step multiple testing procedures [J].
Sarkar, Sanat K. .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2006, 34 (01) :394-415