Directly assessing the relationship between irrelevant speech and articulatory suppression

被引:32
作者
Neath, I [1 ]
Farley, LA [1 ]
Surprenant, AM [1 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
来源
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY | 2003年 / 56卷 / 08期
关键词
PHONOLOGICAL SIMILARITY; DISRUPTION; MEMORY;
D O I
10.1080/02724980244000756
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Larsen and Baddeley (2003) examine whether the disruption caused by articulatory suppression on immediate memory tasks is similar to or different from the disruption caused by irrelevant speech. Based on experiments in which they test whether the phonological similarity effect is present or absent, they conclude that articulatory suppression and irrelevant speech are different. We assessed whether articulatory suppression and irrelevant speech are similar or different by correlating the disruption each causes. A significant correlation obtained, indicating a relation between the two. These apparently different conclusions can be readily resolved by adopting the view that articulatory suppression, irrelevant speech, and many other factors vary in the degree to which they are likely to cause subjects to abandon reliance on phonological/acoustic cues in particular tasks.
引用
收藏
页码:1269 / 1278
页数:10
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   The phonological loop and the irrelevant speech effect: Some comments on Neath (2000) [J].
Baddeley, AD .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2000, 7 (03) :544-549
[2]   ACOUSTIC MASKING IN PRIMARY MEMORY [J].
COLLE, HA ;
WELSH, A .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1976, 15 (01) :17-31
[3]   ACOUSTIC CONFUSIONS IN IMMEDIATE MEMORY [J].
CONRAD, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1964, 55 (01) :75-&
[4]   THE ROLE OF AUDITORY FEATURES IN MEMORY SPAN FOR WORDS [J].
DREWNOWSKI, A ;
MURDOCK, BB .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN LEARNING AND MEMORY, 1980, 6 (03) :319-332
[5]   Individual differences in susceptibility to the ''irrelevant speech effect'' [J].
Ellermeier, W ;
Zimmer, K .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1997, 102 (04) :2191-2199
[6]   Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000) [J].
Jones, DM ;
Tremblay, S .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2000, 7 (03) :550-558
[7]   Disruption of verbal STM by irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and manual tapping: Do they have a common source? [J].
Larsen, JD ;
Baddeley, A .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 56 (08) :1249-1268
[8]   On the irrelevance of phonological similarity to the irrelevant speech effect [J].
LeCompte, DC ;
Shaibe, DM .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 50 (01) :100-118
[9]   Group aggregates and individual reliability: The case of verbal short-term memory [J].
Logie, RH ;
DellaSala, S ;
Laiacona, M ;
Chalmers, P ;
Wynn, V .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1996, 24 (03) :305-321
[10]   FUNCTIONAL-CHARACTERISTICS OF THE INNER VOICE AND THE INNER-EAR - SINGLE OR DOUBLE AGENCY [J].
MACKEN, WJ ;
JONES, DM .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1995, 21 (02) :436-448