Threshold of fragmentation for ultrasonic contrast agents

被引:239
作者
Chomas, JE [1 ]
Dayton, P [1 ]
May, D [1 ]
Ferrara, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Div Biomed Engn, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
ultrasound; contrast agents; blood flow; optical observation; fragmentation;
D O I
10.1117/1.1352752
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Ultrasound contrast agents are small microbubbles that can be readily destroyed with sufficient acoustic pressure, typically, at a frequency in the low megaHertz range. Microvascular flow rate may be estimated by destroying the contrast agent in a vascular bed, and estimating the rate of flow of contrast agents back into the vascular bed. Characterization of contrast agent destruction provides important information for the design of this technique. In this paper, high-speed optical observation of an ultrasound contrast agent during acoustic insonation is performed. The resting diameter is shown to be a significant parameter in the prediction of microbubble destruction, with smaller diameters typically correlated with destruction. Pressure, center frequency, and transmission phase are each shown to have a significant effect on the fragmentation threshold. A linear prediction for the fragmentation threshold as a function of pressure, when normalized by the resting diameter, has a rate of change of 300 kPa/mum for the range of pressures from 310 to 1200 kPa, and a two-cycle excitation pulse with a center frequency of 2.25 MHz. A linear prediction for the fragmentation threshold as a function of frequency, when normalized by the resting diameter, has a rate of change of -1.2 MHz/mum for a transmission pressure of 800 kPa, and a two-cycle excitation pulse with a range of frequencies from 1 to 5 MHz. (C) 2001 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 150
页数:10
相关论文
共 14 条
[2]   GAUGING THE LIKELIHOOD OF CAVITATION FROM SHORT-PULSE, LOW-DUTY CYCLE DIAGNOSTIC ULTRASOUND [J].
APFEL, RE ;
HOLLAND, CK .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1991, 17 (02) :179-185
[3]  
APFEL RE, 1981, ULTRASONICS, P391
[4]   NOTE ON TAYLOR INSTABILITY [J].
BIRKHOFF, G .
QUARTERLY OF APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 1954, 12 (03) :306-309
[5]  
BIRKHOFF G, 1956, Q APPL MATH, V13, P451
[6]   Optical observation of contrast agent destruction [J].
Chomas, JE ;
Dayton, PA ;
May, D ;
Allen, J ;
Klibanov, A ;
Ferrara, K .
APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS, 2000, 77 (07) :1056-1058
[7]   A preliminary evaluation of the effects of primary and secondary radiation forces on acoustic contrast agents [J].
Dayton, PA ;
Morgan, KE ;
Klibanov, ALS ;
Brandenburger, G ;
Nightingale, KR ;
Ferrara, KW .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ULTRASONICS FERROELECTRICS AND FREQUENCY CONTROL, 1997, 44 (06) :1264-1277
[8]   CAVITATION DYNAMICS .2. FREE PULSATIONS AND MODELS FOR CAVITATION BUBBLES [J].
FLYNN, HG .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1975, 58 (06) :1160-1170
[9]   A MECHANISM FOR THE GENERATION OF CAVITATION MAXIMA BY PULSED ULTRASOUND [J].
FLYNN, HG ;
CHURCH, CC .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1984, 76 (02) :505-512
[10]  
Leighton TG, 1994, ACOUSTIC BUBBLE, P335