Nursing interventions for patients with chronic conditions

被引:50
作者
Frich, LMH [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen Hosp, Rigshosp, Ctr Multidisciplinary Pain, DK-2100 Copenhagen O, Denmark
关键词
long-term care; chronic disease; chronic condition; older people; outcome; educational qualifications; nursing;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02779.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background. Maintaining independence in older people or restoring and encouraging self-management in those with chronic conditions are ways of increasing health-related quality of life and at the same time may achieve cost savings. Nurses often carry out these types of interventions in follow-up home visits. Aims. To describe nursing interventions during home visits and their effects on people suffering from a range of chronic conditions. Method. A structured descriptive review was carried out using the Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Cochrane databases and the terms chronic or diabetic or arthrit* or pain and randomi* and [(nurs* and care) or ( nurs* and interventions)]. Findings. In older people the best outcomes are reached if the target population is 'the younger-old', or if intervention is tailored to elders who have stated health problems. The effect depends on the duration of the follow-up period, number of follow-up visits and personality of the nurse. Follow-up nursing interventions for patients with diabetes can improve psychosocial and health outcomes. Education of health providers and amount of time spent with patients seem to be important for positive outcome. A rheumatology nurse specialist seems to provide equally good clinical results as a rheumatologist and produces better patient-related outcomes. Compared with a multidisciplinary team treating patients in day care or inpatient settings, a rheumatology nurse specialist provides less patient satisfaction, but equally good clinical outcomes. Conclusions. Patients with chronic conditions often benefited from follow-up visits by nurses. Visits should be multiple, extended over a long-term, and interventions should be individualized. The outcomes may be described as patient satisfaction, good clinical outcomes and cost savings. Future randomized controlled trials should describe nurses' interventions and educational background to enable replication. Randomized controlled trials using the Health Technology Assessment method would permit comparison between studies and be a good foundation for future decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 153
页数:17
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Cochrane Database Syst Rev
[2]   A randomized controlled study of the Arthritis Self-Management Programme in the UK [J].
Barlow, JH ;
Turner, AP ;
Wright, CC .
HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2000, 15 (06) :665-680
[3]   MEASURING THE IMPACT OF NURSING INTERVENTIONS IN THE COMMUNITY - A SELECTIVE REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE [J].
BARRIBALL, KL ;
MACKENZIE, A .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 1993, 18 (03) :401-407
[4]   Pain epidemiology and health related quality of life in chronic non-malignant pain patients referred to a Danish multidisciplinary pain center [J].
Becker, N ;
Thomsen, AB ;
Olsen, AK ;
Sjogren, P ;
Bech, P ;
Eriksen, J .
PAIN, 1997, 73 (03) :393-400
[5]   Treatment outcome of chronic non-malignant pain patients managed in a Danish multidisciplinary pain centre compared to general practice: a randomised controlled trial [J].
Becker, N ;
Sjogren, P ;
Bech, P ;
Olsen, AK ;
Eriksen, J .
PAIN, 2000, 84 (2-3) :203-211
[6]  
Boehm S, 1993, Clin Nurs Res, V2, P327, DOI 10.1177/105477389300200308
[7]  
BROWN SA, 1988, NURS RES, V37, P223
[8]   Interventions to promote diabetes self-management: State of the science [J].
Brown, SA .
DIABETES EDUCATOR, 1999, 25 (06) :52-61
[9]   The relative effectiveness of educational and behavioral instruction programs for patients with NIDDM: A randomized trial [J].
Campbell, EM ;
Redman, S ;
Moffitt, PS ;
SansonFisher, RW .
DIABETES EDUCATOR, 1996, 22 (04) :379-386
[10]  
Dalby DM, 2000, CAN MED ASSOC J, V162, P497