A comparative computational study of cationic coinage metal-ethylene complexes (C2H4)M(+) (M=Cu, Ag, and Au)

被引:191
作者
Hertwig, RH
Koch, W
Schroder, D
Schwarz, H
Hrusak, J
Schwerdtfeger, P
机构
[1] TECH UNIV BERLIN, INST ORGAN CHEM, D-10623 BERLIN, GERMANY
[2] ACAD SCI CZECH REPUBL, J HEYROVSKY INST PHYS CHEM, CZ-18223 PRAGUE 8, CZECH REPUBLIC
[3] UNIV AUCKLAND, DEPT CHEM, COMPUTAT MAT SCI & ENGN RES CTR, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
[4] UNIV AUCKLAND, SCH ENGN, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
关键词
D O I
10.1021/jp953064i
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The cationic (C2H4)M(+) complexes (M = Cu, Ag, and Au) have been examined by different ab initio molecular orbital, density functional (DFT), and density functional/Hartree-Fock (DFT/HF) hybrid methods using relativistic effective core potentials acid a quasi-relativistic approach to account for relativistic effects. For (C2H4Au+ a substantial relativistic stabilization is observed, such that the computed binding energies are almost twice as high than for (C2H4Ag+ and still significantly higher than for (C2H4Cu+. Structural features and energetics obtained at the various computational levels, although they differ significantly in their computational demands, are in satisfying agreement with each other, adding to the level of confidence that can be attributed to the computationally economic DFT and DFT/HF hybrid methods. In order to determine the nature of the bonding in these (C2H4)M(+) complexes, an energy decomposition scheme is applied to the DFT results. For all three metal cations, the interaction with ethylene shows large covalent contributions. The major part of the covalent terms stems from sigma-donor contribution from the ligand to the metal, whereas pi-acceptor bonding (back-bonding) is less important. An atoms-in-molecules (ATM) analysis of the charge density distribution reveals cyclic structures for (C2H4Au+ and (C2H4Cu+, whereas (C2H4Ag+ is T-shaped.
引用
收藏
页码:12253 / 12260
页数:8
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured], DOI DOI 10.1016/0021-9991(92)90277-6
[2]  
Armentrout P. B., 1996, ORGANOMETALLIC ION C
[3]  
ARMENTROUT PB, 1990, ANNU REV PHYS CHEM, V41, P313
[4]  
Bader R.F. W., 1994, ATOMS MOL
[5]  
BAERENDS EJ, 1973, CHEM PHYS, V2, P71
[6]  
Balasubramanian K, 1987, ADV CHEM PHYS, V67, P287
[7]   ANALYTICAL RELATIVISTIC SELF-CONSISTENT-FIELD CALCULATIONS FOR ATOMS [J].
BARTHELAT, JC ;
PELISSIER, M ;
DURAND, P .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 1980, 21 (06) :1773-1785
[8]  
BARTLETT RJ, 1996, MODERN ELECT STRUC 2
[9]  
BASCH H, COMMUNICATION
[10]   THE BINDING-ENERGIES OF CU+-(H2O)N AND CU+-(NH3)N (N = 1-4) [J].
BAUSCHLICHER, CW ;
LANGHOFF, SR ;
PARTRIDGE, H .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1991, 94 (03) :2068-2072