A computational model of craving and obsession

被引:30
作者
Redish, A. David [1 ]
Johnson, Adam [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Neurosci, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
来源
REWARD AND DECISION MAKING IN CORTICOBASAL GANGLIA NETWORKS | 2007年 / 1104卷
关键词
craving; obsession; addiction; hippocampus; nucleus accumbens; opioid signaling; opiates; dopamine;
D O I
10.1196/annals.1390.014
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
If addictions and problematic behaviors arise from interactions between drugs, reward sequences, and natural learning sytems, then an explanation of clinically problematic conditions (such as the self-administration of drugs or problem gambling) requires an understanding of the neural systems that have evolved to allow an agent to make decisions. We hypothesize a unified decision-making system consisting of three components-a situation recognition system, a flexible, planning-capable system, and an inflexible, habit-like system. In this article, we present a model of the planning-capable system based on a planning process arising from experimentally observed look-ahead dynamics in the hippocampus enabling a forward search of possibilities and an evaluation process in the nucleus accumbens. Based on evidence that opioid signaling can provide hedonic evalutation of an achieved outcome, we hypothesize that similar opioid-signaling processes evaluate the value of expected outcomes. This leads to a model of craving, based on the recognition of a path to a high-value outcome, and obsession, based on a value-induced limitation of the search process. This theory can explain why opioid antagonists reduce both hedonic responses and craving.
引用
收藏
页码:324 / 339
页数:16
相关论文
共 142 条
[1]   The biological, social and clinical bases of drug addiction: Commentary and debate [J].
Altman, J ;
Everitt, BJ ;
Glautier, S ;
Markou, A ;
Nutt, D ;
Oretti, R ;
Phillips, GD ;
Robbins, TW .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 125 (04) :285-345
[2]   Memory processes governing amphetamine-induced psychomotor sensitization [J].
Anagnostaras, SG ;
Schallert, T ;
Robinson, TE .
NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 26 (06) :703-715
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1986, FOUNDATIONS
[4]  
Arbib MichaelA., 1995, HDB BRAIN THEORY NEU
[5]   The effect of naltrexone on taste detection and recognition threshold [J].
Arbisi, PA ;
Billington, CJ ;
Levine, AS .
APPETITE, 1999, 32 (02) :241-249
[6]   Goal-directed instrumental action: contingency and incentive learning and their cortical substrates [J].
Balleine, BW ;
Dickinson, A .
NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 1998, 37 (4-5) :407-419
[7]   EVIDENCE THAT THE AVERSIVE EFFECTS OF OPIOID ANTAGONISTS AND KAPPA-AGONISTS ARE CENTRALLY MEDIATED [J].
BALSKUBIK, R ;
HERZ, A ;
SHIPPENBERG, TS .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1989, 98 (02) :203-206
[8]   SPATIAL MEMORY DEFICIT IN SENESCENT RATS [J].
BARNES, CA ;
NADEL, L ;
HONIG, WK .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE, 1980, 34 (01) :29-39
[9]   Decision making, impulse control and loss of willpower to resist drugs: a neurocognitive perspective [J].
Bechara, A .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, 8 (11) :1458-1463
[10]   What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? [J].
Berridge, KC ;
Robinson, TE .
BRAIN RESEARCH REVIEWS, 1998, 28 (03) :309-369