Qigong for hypertension: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials

被引:88
作者
Lee, Myeong Soo [1 ]
Pittler, Max H.
Guo, Ruoling
Ernst, Edzard
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Peninsula Med Sch, Exeter EX2 4NT, Devon, England
[2] Univ Plymouth, Exeter EX2 4NT, Devon, England
[3] Wonkwang Univ, Inst Med Sci, Ctr Integrat Med, Iksan, South Korea
关键词
blood pressure; hypertension; qigong; systematic review;
D O I
10.1097/HJH.0b013e328092ee18
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Objectives To assess systematically the clinical evidence of qigong for hypertension. Methods Databases were searched up to August 2006. All randomized clinical trials (RCTs) testing qigong in patients with hypertension of any origin and assessing clinically relevant outcomes were considered. Trials using any type of control intervention were included. The selection of studies, data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by at least two reviewers. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Jadad score. Results A total of 121 potentially relevant articles were identified and 12 RCTs were included. Seven RCTs tested qigong in combination with anti hypertensive drugs compared with anti hypertensive drugs alone. The metaanalysis of two trials reporting adequate data suggested beneficial effects in favour of qigong [weighted mean difference, systolic blood pressure (SBP) -12.1 mmHg, 95% confidence interval (CI) -17.1 to -7.0; diastolic blood pressure -8.5 mmHg, 95% CI -12.6 to -4.4]. Qigong was compared with waiting list control in two RCTs and was found to reduce SBP significantly (weighted mean difference -18.5 mmHg, 95% CI -23.1 to -13.9). In three further RCTs the comparisons made were: qigong combined with conventional therapy versus muscle relaxation combined with conventional therapy; qigong as a sole treatment versus exercise. All reported positive results in at least some of the relevant outcome measures. The methodological quality of the studies was low. Conclusion There is some encouraging evidence of qigong for lowering SBP, but the conclusiveness of these findings is limited. Rigorously designed trials are warranted to confirm these results.
引用
收藏
页码:1525 / 1532
页数:8
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], CHIN MED
  • [2] *CDCP, 2006, CARD DIS GLANC
  • [3] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2012, PREV INS PHYS ACT
  • [4] Randomised controlled trial of qigong in the treatment of mild essential hypertension
    Cheung, BMY
    Lo, JLF
    Fong, DYT
    Chan, MY
    Wong, SHT
    Wong, VCW
    Lam, KSL
    Lau, CP
    Karlberg, JPE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2005, 19 (09) : 697 - 704
  • [5] THE EXISTENCE OF PUBLICATION BIAS AND RISK-FACTORS FOR ITS OCCURRENCE
    DICKERSIN, K
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1990, 263 (10): : 1385 - 1389
  • [6] Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German
    Egger, E
    ZellwegerZahner, T
    Schneider, M
    Junker, C
    Lengeler, C
    Antes, G
    [J]. LANCET, 1997, 350 (9074) : 326 - 329
  • [7] Meta-analysis - Bias in location and selection of studies
    Egger, M
    Smith, GD
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 316 (7124): : 61 - 66
  • [8] Alternative therapy bias
    Ernst, E
    Pittler, MH
    [J]. NATURE, 1997, 385 (6616) : 480 - 480
  • [9] Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?
    Jadad, AR
    Moore, RA
    Carroll, D
    Jenkinson, C
    Reynolds, DJM
    Gavaghan, DJ
    McQuay, HJ
    [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1996, 17 (01): : 1 - 12