Reduced exposure to calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplantation

被引:1437
作者
Ekberg, Henrik
Tedesco-Silva, Helio
Demirbas, Alper
Vitko, Stefan
Nashan, Bjorn
Guerkan, Alp
Margreiter, Raimund
Hugo, Christian
Grinyo, Josep M.
Frei, Ulrich
Vanrenterghem, Yves
Daloze, Pierre
Halloran, Philip F.
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Malmo, Sweden
[2] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Akdeniz Univ, Antalya, Turkey
[4] Inst Klin & Expt Med, Prague, Czech Republic
[5] Hannover Med Sch, D-30623 Hannover, Germany
[6] SB Tepecik Hosp, Izmir, Turkey
[7] Univ Klin, Innsbruck, Austria
[8] Univ Hosp, Erlangen, Germany
[9] Ciutat Univ Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
[10] Free Univ Berlin, Klinikum Rudolf Virchow, Charite, D-1000 Berlin, Germany
[11] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
[12] CHU Montreal, Notre Dame Hosp, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[13] Univ Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1056/NEJMoa067411
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Immunosuppressive regimens with the fewest possible toxic effects are desirable for transplant recipients. This study evaluated the efficacy and relative toxic effects of four immunosuppressive regimens. Methods: We randomly assigned 1645 renal-transplant recipients to receive standard-dose cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids, or daclizumab induction, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids in combination with low-dose cyclosporine, low-dose tacrolimus, or low-dose sirolimus. The primary end point was the estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR), as calculated by the Cockcroft-Gault formula, 12 months after transplantation. Secondary end points included acute rejection and allograft survival. Results: The mean calculated GFR was higher in patients receiving low-dose tacrolimus (65.4 ml per minute) than in the other three groups (range, 56.7 to 59.4 ml per minute). The rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection was lower in patients receiving low-dose tacrolimus (12.3%) than in those receiving standard-dose cyclosporine (25.8%), low-dose cyclosporine (24.0%), or low-dose sirolimus (37.2%). Allograft survival differed significantly among the four groups (P=0.02) and was highest in the low-dose tacrolimus group (94.2%), followed by the low-dose cyclosporine group (93.1%), the standard-dose cyclosporine group (89.3%), and the low-dose sirolimus group (89.3%). Serious adverse events were more common in the low-dose sirolimus group than in the other groups (53.2% vs. a range of 43.4 to 44.3%), although a similar proportion of patients in each group had at least one adverse event during treatment (86.3 to 90.5%). Conclusions: A regimen of daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids in combination with low-dose tacrolimus may be advantageous for renal function, allograft survival, and acute rejection rates, as compared with regimens containing daclizumab induction plus either low-dose cyclosporine or low-dose sirolimus or with standard-dose cyclosporine without induction. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00231764.).
引用
收藏
页码:2562 / 2575
页数:14
相关论文
共 21 条
[11]   Incidence, therapy, and consequences of lymphocele after sirolimus-cyclosporine-prednisone immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients [J].
Langer, RM ;
Kahan, BD .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 74 (06) :804-808
[12]   MECHANISM OF CYCLOSPORINE-INDUCED HYPERTENSION [J].
LUKE, RG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1991, 4 (05) :468-471
[14]   Calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity: Longitudinal assessment by protocol histology [J].
Nankivell, BJ ;
Borrows, RJ ;
Fung, CLS ;
O'Connell, PJ ;
Chapman, JR ;
Allen, RDM .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 78 (04) :557-565
[15]   Medical progress - Strategies to improve long-term outcomes after renal transplantation [J].
Pascual, M ;
Theruvath, T ;
Kawai, T ;
Tolkoff-Rubin, N ;
Cosimi, AB .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (08) :580-590
[16]   Report of the crystal city meeting to maximize the use of organs recovered from the cadaver donor [J].
Rosengard, BR ;
Feng, S ;
Alfrey, EJ ;
Zaroff, JG ;
Emond, JC ;
Henry, ML ;
Garrity, ER ;
Roberts, JP ;
Wynn, JJ ;
Metzger, RA ;
Freeman, RB ;
Port, FK ;
Merion, RM ;
Love, RB ;
Busuttil, RW ;
Delmonico, FL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 2 (08) :701-711
[17]   Corticosteroid-free immunosuppression with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and Daclizumab induction in renal transplantation [J].
Rostaing, L ;
Cantarovich, D ;
Mourad, G ;
Budde, K ;
Rigotti, P ;
Mariat, C ;
Margreiter, R ;
Capdevilla, L ;
Lang, P ;
Vialtel, P ;
Ortuño-Mirete, J ;
Charpentier, B ;
Legendre, C ;
Sanchez-Plumed, J ;
Oppenheimer, F ;
Kessler, M .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 79 (07) :807-814
[18]   A large, multicentre trial to compare the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus with cyclosporine microemulsion following renal transplantation [J].
Sperschneider, H .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 33 (1-2) :1279-1281
[19]   Multicenter trial exploring calcineurin inhibitors avoidance in renal transplantation [J].
Vincenti, F ;
Ramos, E ;
Brattstrom, C ;
Cho, S ;
Ekberg, H ;
Grinyo, J ;
Johnson, R ;
Kuypers, D ;
Stuart, F ;
Khanna, A ;
Navarro, M ;
Nashan, B .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 71 (09) :1282-1287
[20]   Tacrolimus versus ciclosporin as primary immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients: meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomised trial data [J].
Webster, AC ;
Woodroffe, RC ;
Taylor, RS ;
Chapman, JR ;
Craig, JC .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 331 (7520) :810-+