Operational map-guided classification of SAR sea ice imagery

被引:54
作者
Maillard, P [1 ]
Clausi, DA
Deng, HW
机构
[1] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[2] Univ Waterloo, Dept Syst Design Engn, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[3] PCI Geomat, Richmond Hill, ON L4B 1M5, Canada
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING | 2005年 / 43卷 / 12期
关键词
classification; distribution comparison; Fisher; gray-level cooccurrence matrix (GLCM); Kolmogorov-Smirnov; Mahalanobis; mapping; Markov random field (MRF); sea ice; segmentation; texture;
D O I
10.1109/TGRS.2005.857897
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
This paper presents a map-guided sea ice classification system built to work in parallel with the Canadian Ice Service (CIS) operations to produce pixel-based ice maps that complement actual "egg code" maps produced by CIS. The system uses the CIS maps as input to guide classification by providing information on the number of ice types and their final label for specific regions. Segmentation is based on a modified adaptive Markov random field (MRF) model that uses synthetic aperture radar (SAR) intensities and texture features as input. The ice type labeling is performed automatically by gathering evidences based on a priori information on one or two classes and deducing the other labels iteratively by comparing distributions of segments. Three methods for comparing the segment distributions (Fisher criterion, Mahalanobis distance, and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test) were implemented and compared. The system is fully described with special attention to the labeling procedure. Examples are presented in the form of two CIS SAR-based ice maps from the Gulf of Saint Lawrence region and one example from the Beaufort Sea. The results indicate that when the segmentation is good, the labeling attains best results (between 71% and 89%) based on evaluation by a sea ice analyst. Some problems remain to be assessed which are primarily attributable to discrepancies in the information provided by the egg code and what is actually visible in the SAR image. Subscale information on floe size and shape available to human analysts, but not in this classification system, also appear to be a critical information for separating some ice types.
引用
收藏
页码:2940 / 2951
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
AGNEW T, 1999, CANADIAN CONTRIBUTIO
[2]  
BARBER DG, 1991, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V57, P385
[3]  
BROWN RD, 2002, NATL PLAN CRYOSPHERI
[4]   REVIEW AND STATUS OF REMOTE-SENSING OF SEA ICE [J].
CARSEY, F .
IEEE JOURNAL OF OCEANIC ENGINEERING, 1989, 14 (02) :127-138
[5]   Comparing cooccurrence probabilities and Markov random fields for texture analysis of SAR sea ice imagery [J].
Clausi, DA ;
Yue, B .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2004, 42 (01) :215-228
[6]   An analysis of co-occurrence texture statistics as a function of grey level quantization [J].
Clausi, DA .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2002, 28 (01) :45-62
[7]   Comparison and fusion of co-occurrence, Gabor and MRF texture features for classification of SAR sea-ice imagery [J].
Clausi, DA .
ATMOSPHERE-OCEAN, 2001, 39 (03) :183-194
[8]   SIMPLE PARALLEL HIERARCHICAL AND RELAXATION ALGORITHMS FOR SEGMENTING NONCAUSAL MARKOVIAN RANDOM-FIELDS [J].
COHEN, FS ;
COOPER, DB .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 1987, 9 (02) :195-219
[9]   Unsupervised segmentation of synthetic aperture radar sea ice imagery using a novel Markov random field model [J].
Deng, H ;
Clausi, DA .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2005, 43 (03) :528-538
[10]   Comparison of radar image segmentation by Gaussian- and Gamma-Markov random field models [J].
Dong, Y ;
Forster, BC ;
Milne, AK .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2003, 24 (04) :711-722