The Size, Concentration, and Growth of Biodiversity-Conservation Nonprofits

被引:46
作者
Armsworth, Paul R. [1 ,2 ]
Fishburn, Isla S. [1 ]
Davies, Zoe G. [1 ,3 ]
Gilbert, Jennifer [1 ]
Leaver, Natasha [1 ]
Gaston, Kevin J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Dept Anim & Plant Sci, Biodivers & Macroecol Grp, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Tennessee, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Knoxville, TN USA
[3] Univ Kent, Sch Anthropol & Conservat, Durrell Inst Conservat & Ecol, Canterbury CT2 7NZ, Kent, England
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
nongovernmental organization; industrial organization; conservation planning; firm size distribution; conservation finance; STATE-LEVEL VARIATION; LAND CONSERVATION; PROTECTED AREAS; COSTS; ORGANIZATIONS; SCALE; EFFICIENCY; SELECTION; BENEFITS;
D O I
10.1525/bio.2012.62.3.8
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Nonprofit organizations play a critical role in efforts to conserve biodiversity. Their success in this regard will be determined in part by how effectively individual nonprofits and the sector as a whole are structured. One of the most fundamental questions about an organization's structure is how large it should be, with the logical counterpart being how concentrated the whole sector should be. We review empirical patterns in the size, concentration, and growth of over 1700 biodiversity-conservation nonprofits registered for tax purposes in the United States within the context of relevant economic theory. Conservation-nonprofit sizes vary by six to seven orders of magnitude and are positively skewed. Larger nonprofits access more revenue streams and hold more of their assets in land and buildings than smaller or midsized nonprofits do. The size of conservation nonprofits varies with the ecological focus of the organization, but the growth rates of nonprofits do not.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 281
页数:11
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Could state-level variation in the number of land trusts make economic sense? [J].
Albers, HJ ;
Ando, AW .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2003, 79 (03) :311-327
[2]  
ALCHIAN AA, 1972, AM ECON REV, V62, P777
[3]   Goodwill bazaar: NGO competition and giving to development [J].
Aldashev, Gani ;
Verdier, Thierry .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2010, 91 (01) :48-63
[4]   Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation [J].
Ando, A ;
Camm, J ;
Polasky, S ;
Solow, A .
SCIENCE, 1998, 279 (5359) :2126-2128
[5]   Demand-side factors in optimal land conservation choice [J].
Ando, Amy W. ;
Shah, Payal .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2010, 32 (02) :203-221
[6]   GIVING WITH IMPURE ALTRUISM - APPLICATIONS TO CHARITY AND RICARDIAN EQUIVALENCE [J].
ANDREONI, J .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1989, 97 (06) :1447-1458
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1974, The limits of organization
[8]   Management costs for small protected areas and economies of scale in habitat conservation [J].
Armsworth, Paul R. ;
Cantu-Salazar, Lisette ;
Parnell, Mark ;
Davies, Zoe G. ;
Stoneman, Rob .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2011, 144 (01) :423-429
[9]   Community-based conservation in a globalized world [J].
Berkes, Fikret .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2007, 104 (39) :15188-15193
[10]   Rival charities [J].
Bilodeau, M ;
Slivinski, A .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1997, 66 (03) :449-467