Comparison of somatostatin receptor imaging, computed tomography and ultrasound in the clinical management of neuroendocrine gastro-entero-pancreatic tumours

被引:135
作者
Chiti, A
Fanti, S
Savelli, G
Romeo, A
Bellanova, B
Rodari, M
van Graafeiland, BJ
Monetti, N
Bombardieri, E
机构
[1] Ist Nazl Studio & Cura Tumori, Div Nucl Med, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[2] Policlin S Orsola Malpighi, Dept Nucl Med, Bologna, Italy
[3] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Div Nucl Med, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
somatostatin receptors; radionuclide imaging; neuroendocrine tumours; gastro-entero-pancreatic tract;
D O I
10.1007/s002590050314
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Neuroendocrine tumours displaying somatostatin receptors have been successfully visualised with somatostatin receptor imaging (SRI). However, there may be differences in sensitivity depending on the site of the primary tumour and/or its metastases. We studied 131 patients affected by neuroendocrine rumours of the gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) tract. A pathological diagnosis was obtained in 116 patients, while in 15 the diagnosis was based on instrumental results and follow-up. Fifty-one patients were examined for staging purposes, 80 were in follow-up. Images were acquired 24 and 48 h after the injection of 150-220 MBq of indium-111 pentetreotide, Whole-body and SPET images were obtained in all patients. Patients were also studied with computed tomography (CT), ultrasound (US), and other procedures. Tumours were classified according to their site of origin: pancreas n = 39, ileum n = 32, stomach it = 16, appendix n = 9, duodenum n = 5, jejunum n = 5, rectum n = 3, biliary tract n = 2, colon n = 2, caecum n = 1, liver metastases from unknown primary = 15, widespread metastases from unknown primary = 2. Sensitivity for primary tumour localisation was as follows: SRI = 62%; CT = 43%; US = 36%; other procedures = 45%. Sensitivity for liver metastases: SRI = 90%; CT = 78%; US = 88%; other procedures = 71%. Sensitivity for the detection of extrahepatic soft tissue lesions was: SRI = 90%; CT = 66%; US = 47%; other procedures = 61%, Sensitivity for the detection of the primary tumour in patients with metastases from unknown primary sites: SRI 4/17; CT 0/13; US 0/12; other procedures 1/10. In 28% of the patients SRI revealed previously unknown lesions, and in 21% it determined a modification of the scheduled therapy. Our study confirms the important role of SRI in the management of GEP tumours. However, we feel that a critical investigation should address its role in locating primary tumours, in particular in patients with metastases from unknown primary sites.
引用
收藏
页码:1396 / 1403
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] DORR U, 1993, EUR J NUCL MED, V20, P431
  • [2] HAMMOND PJ, 1994, Q J MED, V87, P83
  • [3] JAMAR F, 1995, J NUCL MED, V36, P542
  • [4] JOSEPH K, 1993, HORM METAB RES, V27, P28
  • [5] KALKNER KM, 1995, CANCER RES, V55, pS5801
  • [6] SOMATOSTATIN RECEPTOR SCINTIGRAPHY WITH [IN-111-DTPA-D-PHE(1)]- AND [I-123-TYR(3)]-OCTREOTIDE - THE ROTTERDAM EXPERIENCE WITH MORE THAN 1000 PATIENTS
    KRENNING, EP
    KWEKKEBOOM, DJ
    BAKKER, WH
    BREEMAN, WAP
    KOOIJ, PPM
    OEI, HY
    VANHAGEN, M
    POSTEMA, PTE
    DEJONG, M
    REUBI, JC
    VISSER, TJ
    REIJS, AEM
    HOFLAND, LJ
    KOPER, JW
    LAMBERTS, SWJ
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1993, 20 (08): : 716 - 731
  • [7] KRENNING EP, 1994, SEMIN ONCOL, V21, P6
  • [8] KWEKKEBOOM DJ, 1993, EUR J NUCL MED, V20, P283
  • [9] LAMBERTS SWJ, 1994, SEMIN ONCOL, V21, P1
  • [10] Lebtahi R, 1997, J NUCL MED, V38, P853