Significance of subclinical rejection in early renal allograft biopsies for chronic allograft dysfunction

被引:34
作者
Miyagi, M
Ishikawa, Y
Mizuiri, S
Aikawa, A
Ohara, T
Hasegawa, A
机构
[1] Toho Univ, Dept Nephrol, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Toho Univ, Dept Pathol 2, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
chronic allograft nephropathy; protocol biopsy; subclinical rejection;
D O I
10.1111/j.1399-0012.2005.00303.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
To determine the significance of early subclinical rejection of renal allografts, we reviewed 127 biopsy specimens obtained soon after transplantation. Histological finding was categorized according to a modification of the Banff scheme as: acute rejection (AR), borderline changes (BL); non-specific inflammatory changes, (NI) and no rejection (NR). Subclinical rejection was defined as AR, BL or NI. Patients with BL or NI were divided into two groups; one was treated with high-dose methylprednisolone (MP), the other remained untreated. Freedom from chronic allograft dysfunction (defined as non-doubling of serum creatinine 5 yr after transplantation) was significantly more frequent in the NR group (89%) than in the BL (70%) and AR (64%) groups. At 1 yr after transplantation, mean serum creatinine had increased significantly only in the untreated group (p < 0.05), and re-biopsy showed that interstitial fibrosis had developed to a significantly greater extent in the untreated group than in the treated group (p < 0.01). Subclinical rejection in the early protocol biopsies correlated closely with subsequent allograft dysfunction. High-dose MP treatment for early subclinical rejection may be effective in suppressing the development of interstitial fibrosis at 1 yr after transplantation.
引用
收藏
页码:456 / 465
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF RENAL BIOPSY IN ACUTE REJECTION OF KIDNEY-TRANSPLANTATION [J].
BANFI, G ;
IMBASCIATI, E ;
TARANTINO, A ;
PONTICELLI, C .
NEPHRON, 1981, 28 (05) :222-226
[2]   EARLY VERSUS LATE ACUTE RENAL-ALLOGRAFT REJECTION - IMPACT ON CHRONIC REJECTION [J].
BASADONNA, GP ;
MATAS, AJ ;
GILLINGHAM, KJ ;
PAYNE, WD ;
DUNN, DL ;
SUTHERLAND, DER ;
GORES, PF ;
GRUESSNER, RWG ;
NAJARIAN, JS .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1993, 55 (05) :993-995
[3]   CHARACTERISTICS OF EARLY ROUTINE RENAL-ALLOGRAFT BIOPSIES [J].
BURDICK, JF ;
BESCHORNER, WE ;
SMITH, WJ ;
MCGRAW, D ;
BENDER, WL ;
WILLIAMS, GM ;
SOLEZ, K .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1984, 38 (06) :679-684
[4]  
CECKA JM, 2001, CLIN TRANSPLANT, P123
[5]  
Colvin RB, 1997, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V8, P1930
[6]   CYCLOSPORINE AND RENAL GRAFT HISTOLOGY [J].
DARDENNE, AJ ;
DUNNILL, MS ;
THOMPSON, JF ;
MCWHINNIE, D ;
WOOD, RFM ;
MORRIS, PJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1986, 39 (02) :145-151
[7]   A blinded retrospective analysis of renal allograft pathology using the banff schema - Implications for clinical management [J].
Dean, DE ;
Kamath, S ;
Peddi, VR ;
Schroeder, TJ ;
First, MR ;
Cavallo, T .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 68 (05) :642-645
[8]   International variation in the interpretation of renal transplant biopsies: Report of the CERTPAP Project [J].
Furness, PN ;
Taub, N .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 60 (05) :1998-2012
[9]   Correlation between Banff classification, acute renal rejection scores and reversal of rejection [J].
Gaber, LW ;
Moore, LW ;
Alloway, RR ;
Flax, SD ;
ShokouhAmiri, MH ;
Schroder, T ;
Gaber, AO .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1996, 49 (02) :481-487
[10]   Polyomavirus BK infection in pediatric kidney-allograft recipients: A single-center analysis of incidence, risk factors, and novel therapeutic approaches [J].
Ginevri, F ;
de Santis, R ;
Comoli, P ;
Pastorino, N ;
Rossi, C ;
Botti, G ;
Fontana, I ;
Nocera, A ;
Cardillo, M ;
Ciardi, MR ;
Locatelli, F ;
Maccario, R ;
Perfumo, F ;
Azzi, A .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 75 (08) :1266-1270