Deductive reasoning and the brain

被引:38
作者
Wharton, CM [1 ]
Grafman, J [1 ]
机构
[1] NINDS, Cognit Neurosci Sect, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01122-X
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Although relatively few in number, cognitive neuroscience studies of reasoning have two general implications for cognitive theories of deduction. First, an important distinction among these theories is whether they focus on the effect of personally relevant content on the processes and representations underlying deductive reasoning. Evidence is reviewed indicating that there is a neuroanatomical basis for both content-independent and content-dependent theories of deduction. Clinical and neuroimaging studies appear to show that content-independent reasoning is mediated by the left hemisphere, whereas content-dependent reasoning is mediated by regions in the right hemisphere and the bilateral ventromedial frontal cortex. In normal subjects, reasoning is likely to be based on contributions from both hemispheres. Second, clinical evidence indicates that the visuospatial processes used in deductive reasoning are mediated by the posterior areas of the left hemisphere, and that verbal and visuospatial reasoning representations overlap at the neuroanatomical level. This finding weighs against the claims of mental-model theory that deduction involves a significant nonverbal component. Further investigation, particularly with contemporary neuroimaging methods, is needed to test these preliminary conclusions.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 59
页数:6
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Adolphs R, 1996, RES PER NEUROSCI, P157
[2]  
[Anonymous], NEW HORIZONS PSYCHOL
[3]   Failure to respond autonomically to anticipated future outcomes following damage to prefrontal cortex [J].
Bechara, A ;
Tranel, D ;
Damasio, H ;
Damasio, AR .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 1996, 6 (02) :215-225
[4]   Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy [J].
Bechara, A ;
Damasio, H ;
Tranel, D ;
Damasio, AR .
SCIENCE, 1997, 275 (5304) :1293-1295
[5]   PREDICTING INTERMEDIATE AND MULTIPLE CONCLUSIONS IN PROPOSITIONAL LOGIC INFERENCE PROBLEMS - FURTHER EVIDENCE FOR A MENTAL LOGIC [J].
BRAINE, MDS ;
OBRIEN, DP ;
NOVECK, IA ;
SAMUELS, MC ;
LEA, RB ;
FISH, SM ;
YANG, YG .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1995, 124 (03) :263-292
[6]   A THEORY OF IF - A LEXICAL ENTRY, REASONING PROGRAM, AND PRAGMATIC PRINCIPLES [J].
BRAINE, MDS ;
OBRIEN, DP .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1991, 98 (02) :182-203
[7]   SPATIAL REASONING [J].
BYRNE, RMJ ;
JOHNSONLAIRD, PN .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1989, 28 (05) :564-575
[8]   RIGHT-HEMISPHERIC DAMAGE AND VERBAL PROBLEM-SOLVING BEHAVIOR [J].
CARAMAZZA, A ;
GORDON, J ;
ZURIF, EB ;
DELUCA, D .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1976, 3 (01) :41-46
[9]   PRAGMATIC REASONING SCHEMAS [J].
CHENG, PW ;
HOLYOAK, KJ .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 17 (04) :391-416
[10]   Divergent thinking styles of the hemispheres: How syllogisms are solved during transitory hemisphere suppression [J].
Deglin, VL ;
Kinsbourne, M .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 1996, 31 (03) :285-307