Assessing the impact of carbon tax differentiation in the European Union

被引:37
作者
Babiker, MH [1 ]
Criqui, P
Ellerman, AD
Reilly, JM
Viguier, LL
机构
[1] MIT, Joint Program Sci & Policy Global Change, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] CNRS, IEPE, F-75700 Paris, France
[3] Univ Geneva, Fac Econ & Social Sci, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
[4] Arab Planning Inst, Kuwait, Kuwait
关键词
D O I
10.1023/A:1025543207122
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To what extent do the welfare costs associated with the implementation of the Burden Sharing Agreement in the European Union depend on sectoral allocation of emissions rights? What are the prospects for strategic climate policy to favor domestic production? This paper attempts to answer those questions using a CGE model featuring a detailed representation of the European economies. First, numerical simulations show that equalizing marginal abatement costs across domestic sectors greatly reduces the burden of the emissions constraint but also that other allocations may be preferable for some countries because of pre-existing tax distortions. Second, we show that the effect of a single country's attempt to undertake a strategic policy to limit impacts on its domestic energy-intensive industries has mixed effects. Exempting energy-intensive industries from the reduction program is a costly solution to maintain the international competitiveness of these industries; a tax-cum-subsidy approach is shown to be better than exemption policy to sustain exports. The welfare impact either policy - exemption or subsidy - on other European countries is likely to be small because of general equilibrium effects.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 197
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], COSTS KYOTO PROTOCOL
  • [2] Japanese nuclear power and the Kyoto agreement
    Babiker, M
    Reilly, J
    Ellerman, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE JAPANESE AND INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIES, 2000, 14 (03) : 169 - 188
  • [3] The Kyoto Protocol and developing countries
    Babiker, M
    Reilly, JM
    Jacoby, HD
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2000, 28 (08) : 525 - 536
  • [4] BABIKER M, 2000, 71 MIT JOINT PROGR S
  • [5] Babiker M., 1999, 53 MIT JOINT PROGR S
  • [6] BABIKER MH, 2000, 61 MIT JOINT PROGR S
  • [7] BARRY B, 1994, RATIO JURIS, V7, P325
  • [8] BERNARD A, 2001, UNPUB COUT EUROPE UN
  • [9] DOMESTIC DISTORTIONS, TARIFFS AND THE THEORY OF OPTIMUM SUBSIDY
    BHAGWATI, J
    RAMASWAMI, VK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1963, 71 (01) : 44 - 50
  • [10] Carbon taxes with exemptions in an open economy: A general equilibrium analysis of the German tax initiative
    Bohringer, C
    Rutherford, TF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1997, 32 (02) : 189 - 203