The insurance market's influence on investments in safety measures

被引:13
作者
Abrahamsen, Eirik Bjorheim [1 ]
Asche, Frank [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stavanger, N-4036 Stavanger, Norway
关键词
Insurance; Safety measures; Risk acceptance criteria;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssci.2010.04.006
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In a risky process there are three alternative ways to treat the negative consequences of the risk or the accident. We can: (1) take all the consequences when an accidental event occurs, (2) reduce the probability and/or the consequences of an accidental event by safety measures or (3) transfer the consequences of the occurrence to parties better able to carry them (i.e. buying insurance). In safety management a prevailing practice is that access to an insurance market does not affect the investment in safety measures. In this paper we discuss what the consequences are of this common practice in relation to insurance and mandatory safety requirements. We conclude that an overinvestment in safety measures is very likely if insurance is not taken into account. Moreover, mandatory safety measures and insurance can lead to both over- and underinvestment in safety measures. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1279 / 1285
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   On the consistency of risk acceptance criteria with normative theories for decision-making [J].
Abrahamsen, E. B. ;
Aven, T. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2008, 93 (12) :1906-1910
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Risk governance
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Microeconomic analysis
[4]  
Aven T., 2007, INT J PERFORMABILITY, V3, P345, DOI DOI 10.23940/IJPE.07.3.P345.MAG
[5]  
Bedford T., 2001, Probabilistic Risk Analysis: Foundations and Methods
[6]  
Copeland T.E., 2005, FINANCIAL THEORY COR, Vfourth
[7]  
Dorman P., 1996, Markets and mortality: Economics, dangerous work, and the value of human life
[8]   MARKET INSURANCE, SELF-INSURANCE, AND SELF-PROTECTION [J].
EHRLICH, I ;
BECKER, GS .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1972, 80 (04) :623-648
[9]  
JONESLEE M, 1974, J POLIT ECON, V82, P835, DOI 10.1086/260238