Intraobserver and interobserver variability in GTV delineation on FDG-PET-CT images of head and neck cancers

被引:109
作者
Breen, Stephen L.
Publicover, Julia
De Silva, Shiroma
Pond, Greg
Brock, Kristy
O'Sullivan, Brian
Cummings, Bernard
Dawson, Laura
Keller, Anne
Kim, John
Ringash, Jolie
Yu, Eugene
Hendler, Aaron
Waldron, John
机构
[1] Princess Margaret Hosp, Dept Radiat Phys, Radiat Med Program, Univ Hlth Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Radiat Oncol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Princess Margaret Hosp, Dept Biostat, Univ Hlth Network, Toronto, ON M4X 1K9, Canada
[4] Mt Sinai Hosp, Joint Dept Med Imaging, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Dept Med Imaging, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2007年 / 68卷 / 03期
关键词
PET-CT; head and neck cancer; target volume delineation; 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose; radiotherapy;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.12.039
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine if the addition of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) data changes primary site gross tumor volumes (GTVs) in head and neck cancers. Methods and Materials: Computed tomography (CT), contrast-enhanced CT, and FDG-PET-CT scans were obtained in 10 patients with head and neck cancers. Eight experienced observers (6 head and neck oncologists and 2 neuro-radiologists) with access to clinical and radiologic reports outlined primary site GTVs on each modality. Three cases were recontoured twice to assess intraobserver variability. The magnitudes of the GTVs were compared. Intra- and interobserver variability was assessed by a two-way repeated measures analysis of variance. Inter- and intraobserver reliability were calculated. Results: There were no significant differences in the GTVs across the image modalities when compared as ensemble averages; the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test showed that CT volumes were larger than PET-CT. Observers demonstrated the greatest consistency and were most interchangeable on contrast-enhanced CT; they performed less reliably on PET-CT. Conclusions: The addition of PET-CT to primary site GTV delineation of head and neck cancers does not change the volume of the GTV defined by this group of expert observers in this patient sample. An FDG-PET may demonstrate differences in neck node delineation and in other disease sites. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:763 / 770
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Prediction of outcome in head-and-neck cancer patients using the standardized uptake value of 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose [J].
Allal, AS ;
Slosman, DO ;
Kebdani, T ;
Allaoua, M ;
Lehmann, W ;
Dulguerov, P .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 59 (05) :1295-1300
[2]   Defining a radiotherapy target with positron emission tomography [J].
Black, QC ;
Grills, IS ;
Kestin, LL ;
Wong, CYO ;
Wong, JW ;
Martinez, AA ;
Yan, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 60 (04) :1272-1282
[3]   Observer variation in contouring gross tumor volume in patients with poorly defined non-small-cell lung tumors on CT:: The impact of 18FDG-hybrid PET fusion [J].
Caldwell, CB ;
Mah, K ;
Ung, YC ;
Danjoux, CE ;
Balogh, JM ;
Ganguli, SN ;
Ehrlich, LE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 51 (04) :923-931
[4]   Radiation treatment planning with an integrated positron emission and computer tomography (PET/CT):: A feasibility study [J].
Ciernik, IF ;
Dizendorf, E ;
Baumert, BG ;
Reiner, B ;
Burger, C ;
Davis, JB ;
Lütolf, UM ;
Steinert, HC ;
Von Schulthess, GK .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 57 (03) :853-863
[5]   Tumor volume in pharyngolaryngeal squamous cell carcinoma:: Comparison at CT, MR imaging, and FDG PET and validation with surgical specimen [J].
Daisne, JF ;
Duprez, T ;
Weynand, B ;
Lonneux, M ;
Hamoir, M ;
Reychler, H ;
Grégoire, V .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 233 (01) :93-100
[6]   Tri-dimensional automatic segmentation of PET volumes based on measured source-to-background ratios:: influence of reconstruction algorithms [J].
Daisne, JF ;
Sibomana, M ;
Bol, A ;
Doumont, T ;
Lonneux, M ;
Grégoire, V .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2003, 69 (03) :247-250
[7]   A local contrast based approach to threshold segmentation for PET target volume delineation [J].
Drever, Laura ;
Robinson, Don M. ;
McEwan, Alexander ;
Roa, Wilson .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (06) :1583-1594
[8]   STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY FOR THE CONCURRENT ASSESSMENT OF INTERRATER AND INTRARATER RELIABILITY - USING GONIOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS AS AN EXAMPLE [J].
ELIASZIW, M ;
YOUNG, SL ;
WOODBURY, MG ;
FRYDAYFIELD, K .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1994, 74 (08) :777-788
[9]  
Eschmann SM, 2005, J NUCL MED, V46, P253
[10]   Does registration of pet and planning CT images decrease interobserver and intraobserver variation in delineating tumor volumes for non-small-cell lung cancer? [J].
Fox, JL ;
Rengan, R ;
O'Meara, W ;
Yorke, E ;
Erdi, Y ;
Nehmeh, S ;
Leibel, SA ;
Rosenzweig, KE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 62 (01) :70-75