Monte Carlo dose calculations of beta-emitting sources for intravascular brachytherapy: A comparison between EGS4, EGSnrc, and MCNP

被引:50
作者
Wang, RQ [1 ]
Li, XA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Radiat Oncol, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
Monte Carlo; dosimetry; intravascular brachytherapy;
D O I
10.1118/1.1339880
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The dose parameters for the beta-particle emitting Sr-90/Y-90 source for intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT) have been calculated by different investigators. At a distant distance from the source, noticeable differences are seen in these parameters calculated using different Monte Carlo codes. The purpose of this work is to quantify as well as to understand these differences. We have compared a series of calculations using an EGS4, an EGSnrc, and the MCNP Monte Carlo codes. Data calculated and compared include the depth dose curve for a broad parallel beam of electrons, and radial dose distributions for point electron sources (monoenergetic or polyenergetic) and for a real 90Sr/90Y source. For the Sr-90/Y-90 source, the doses at the reference position (2 mm radial distance) calculated by the three code agree within 2%. However, the differences between the dose calculated by the three codes can be over 20% in the radial distance range interested in IVBT. The difference increases with radial distance from source, and reaches 30% at the tail of dose curve. These differences may be partially attributed to the different multiple scattering theories and Monte Carlo models for electron transport adopted in these three codes. Doses calculated by the EGSnrc code are more accurate than those by the EGS4. The two calculations agree within 5% for radial distance <6 mm. (C) 2001 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 141
页数:8
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Bielajew A., 1990, The Dosimetry of Ionizing Radiation, Volume, P427
[2]  
Briesmeister J.F., 1997, LA12625M
[3]   A SHORT ATLAS OF BETA-RAY SPECTRA [J].
CROSS, WG ;
ING, H ;
FREEDMAN, N .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1983, 28 (11) :1251-1260
[4]  
GIERGA DP, 1999, LA13440 LOS AL NAT L
[5]  
HALBLEIB JA, CCC467 ORNL RAD SHIE
[6]  
Kawrakow I., 2000, PIRS701 NRCC
[7]   Beta versus gamma for catheter-based intravascular brachytherapy: Dosimetric perspectives in the presence of metallic stents and calcified plaques [J].
Li, XA ;
Wang, RQ ;
Yu, C ;
Suntharalingam, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 46 (04) :1043-1049
[8]  
LI XA, IN PRESS MED PHYS
[9]   Intravascular brachytherapy physics: Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 60 [J].
Nath, R ;
Amols, H ;
Coffey, C ;
Duggan, D ;
Jani, S ;
Li, ZF ;
Schell, M ;
Soares, C ;
Whiting, J ;
Cole, PE ;
Crocker, I ;
Schwartz, R .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (02) :119-152
[10]  
Nelson W.R., 1965, 265 SLAC