Transport of atmospheric fine particulate matter: Part 2 - Findings from recent field programs on the intraurban variability in fine particulate matter

被引:30
作者
Turner, Jay R. [1 ]
Allen, David T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Dept Energy Environm & Chem Engn, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Energy & Environm Res Ctr, Austin, TX USA
关键词
D O I
10.3155/1047-3289.58.2.196
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Air quality field data, collected as part of the fine particulate matter Supersites Program and other field measurements programs, have been used to assess the degree of intraurban variability for various physical and chemical properties of ambient fine particulate matter. Spatial patterns vary from nearly homogeneous to quite heterogeneous, depending on the city, parameter of interest, and the approach or method used to define spatial variability. Secondary formation, which is often regional in nature, drives fine particulate matter mass and the relevant chemical components toward high intraurban spatial homogeneity. Those particulate matter components that are dominated by primary emissions within the urban area, such as black carbon and several trace elements, tend to exhibit greater spatial heterogeneity. A variety of study designs and data analysis approaches have been used to characterize intraurban variability. High temporal correlation does not imply spatial homogeneity. For example, there can be high temporal correlation but with spatial heterogeneity manifested as smooth spatial gradients, often emanating from areas of high emissions such as the urban core or industrial zones.
引用
收藏
页码:196 / 215
页数:20
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Transport of atmospheric fine particulate matter: Part 1 - Findings from recent field programs on the extent of regional transport within North America [J].
Allen, David T. ;
Turner, Jay R. .
JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2008, 58 (02) :254-264
[2]  
ALLEN GA, 2004, IN PRESS SPATIAL TEM
[3]   Spatial representativeness and scales of transport during the 1995 Integrated Monitoring Study in California's San Joaquin Valley [J].
Blanchard, CL ;
Carr, EL ;
Collins, JF ;
Smith, TB ;
Lehrman, DE ;
Michaels, HM .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 33 (29) :4775-4786
[4]   Daily sampling of PM2.5 in Atlanta:: results of the first year of the assessment of spatial aerosol composition in Atlanta study -: art. no. 8415 [J].
Butler, AJ ;
Andrew, MS ;
Russell, AG .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2003, 108 (D1)
[5]   Source identification and apportionment of fine particulate matter in Houston, TX, using positive matrix factorization [J].
Buzcu, B ;
Fraser, MP ;
Kulkarni, P ;
Chellam, S .
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2003, 20 (06) :533-545
[6]  
DEMERJIAN KL, 2005, COMMUNICATION
[7]   Urban-scale variability of ambient particulate matter attributes [J].
Freiman, M. T. ;
Hirshel, N. ;
Broday, D. M. .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 40 (29) :5670-5684
[8]   Size and composition distribution of atmospheric particles in southern California [J].
Hughes, LS ;
Allen, JO ;
Kleeman, MJ ;
Johnson, RJ ;
Cass, GR ;
Gross, DS ;
Gard, EE ;
Gälli, ME ;
Morrical, BD ;
Fergenson, DP ;
Dienes, T ;
Noble, CA ;
Silva, PJ ;
Prather, KA .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 33 (20) :3506-3515
[9]   Spatial variation of PM2.5 chemical species and source-apportioned mass concentrations in New York City [J].
Ito, K ;
Xue, N ;
Thurston, G .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 38 (31) :5269-5282
[10]   Spatial variability of fine particle mass, components, and source contributions during the regional air pollution study in St. Louis [J].
Kim, E ;
Hopke, PK ;
Pinto, JP ;
Wilson, WE .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 39 (11) :4172-4179