Monte Carlo assessment of parameter uncertainty in conceptual catchment models: the Metropolis algorithm

被引:583
作者
Kuczera, G [1 ]
Parent, E
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle, Dept Civil Surveying & Environm Engn, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
[2] ENGREF, Lab Gest Risque Sci Eau, F-75732 Paris 15, France
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Bayesian inference; conceptual catchment models; importance sampling; Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling; parameter uncertainty; rainfall-runoff models;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00198-X
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Two Monte Carlo-based approaches for assessing parameter uncertainty in complex hydrologic models are considered. The first, known as importance sampling, has been implemented in the generalised likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) framework of Beven and Binley. The second, known as the Metropolis algorithm, differs from importance sampling in that it uses a random walk that adapts to the true probability distribution describing parameter uncertainty. Three case studies are used to investigate and illustrate these Monte Carlo approaches. The first considers a simple water balance model for which exact results are known. It is shown that importance sampling is inferior to Metropolis sampling. Unless a large number of random samples are drawn, importance sampling can produce seriously misleading results. The second and third case studies consider more complex catchment models to illustrate the insights the Metropolis algorithm can offer. They demonstrate assessment of parameter uncertainty in the presence of bimodality, evaluation of the significance of split-sample tests, use of prior information and the assessment of confidence limits on hydrologic responses not used in calibration. When compared with the capabilities of traditional inference based on first-order approximation, the Metropolis algorithm provides a quantum advance in our capability to deal with parameter uncertainty in hydrologic models. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 85
页数:17
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1976, TIME SERIES ANAL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, PRACTICAL MARKOV CHA
[3]  
BAYES T, 1763, PHIL T ROY SOC, V53
[4]  
Berger JO., 1985, Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis, V2, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4757-4286-2
[5]   THE FUTURE OF DISTRIBUTED MODELS - MODEL CALIBRATION AND UNCERTAINTY PREDICTION [J].
BEVEN, K ;
BINLEY, A .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 1992, 6 (03) :279-298
[6]  
Box GE., 2011, BAYESIAN INFERENCE S
[7]  
BROOKS SP, 1998, J ROYAL STAT SOC D
[8]   PARALLEL RECURSIVE PREDICTION ERROR ALGORITHM FOR TRAINING LAYERED NEURAL NETWORKS [J].
CHEN, S ;
COWAN, CFN ;
BILLINGS, SA ;
GRANT, PM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 1990, 51 (06) :1215-1228
[9]  
de Finetti B., 1937, ANN IHP
[10]   EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION FOR CONCEPTUAL RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELS [J].
DUAN, QY ;
SOROOSHIAN, S ;
GUPTA, V .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1992, 28 (04) :1015-1031