The suitability of hexyl cinnamic aldehyde as a calibrant for the murine local lymph node assay

被引:51
作者
Dearman, RJ
Wright, ZM
Basketter, DA
Ryan, CA
Gerberick, GF
Kimber, I
机构
[1] Syngenta Cent Toxicol Lab, Macclesfield SK10 4TJ, Cheshire, England
[2] Unilever Res, Syngenta Toxicol Unit, Sharnbrook MK44 1LQ, Beds, England
[3] Procter & Gamble Co, Cincinnati, OH 45253 USA
关键词
contact allergy; local lymph node assay; positive controls; stability; hexyl cinnamic aldehyde;
D O I
10.1034/j.1600-0536.2001.044006357.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
The murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) for the prospective identification of contact allergens assesses skin sensitization potential as a function of proliferative activity induced in lymph nodes draining the site of topical exposure to test chemical. This method has been endorsed recently as a stand alone test for the identification of contact allergens. We have now examined the suitability of hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (HCA), a recommended positive control for skin sensitization testing, as a calibrant for comparing the consistency of LLNA responses with time, and between laboratories, and thus for the routine assessment of assay reliability Standard LLNAs were performed with CBA strain mice in 3 independent laboratories over a period of 8 years. Dose-response curves were used to derive mathematically the EC3 value (the estimated concentration of chemical necessary to cause a stimulation index (SI) of 3 compared with proliferation induced by concurrent vehicle controls). In each laboratory, 6 separate experiments were conducted using a single concentration of HCA (25%). Very similar stimulation indices were achieved, with mean values of 9.0, 6.5 and 6.6 recorded. A total of 10 dose-response experiments were performed independently in the 3 laboratories and these revealed that l:here was very little inter-laboratory, or temporal, variation in EC3 values. These data confirm that HC:A responses in the LLNA are very stable and demonstrate that HCA provides a suitable calibrant for determining assay sensitivity and performance.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 361
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Use of the local lymph node assay for the estimation of relative contact allergenic potency [J].
Basketter, DA ;
Blaikie, L ;
Dearman, RJ ;
Kimber, I ;
Ryan, CA ;
Gerberick, GF ;
Harvey, P ;
Evans, P ;
White, IR ;
Rycroft, RJG .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2000, 42 (06) :344-348
[2]   RESULTS WITH OECD RECOMMENDED POSITIVE CONTROL SENSITIZERS IN THE MAXIMIZATION, BUEHLER AND LOCAL LYMPH-NODE ASSAYS [J].
BASKETTER, DA ;
SELBIE, E ;
SCHOLES, EW ;
LEES, D ;
KIMBER, I ;
BOTHAM, PA .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1993, 31 (01) :63-67
[3]   AN EVALUATION OF THE SUITABILITY OF BENZOCAINE AS A POSITIVE CONTROL SKIN SENSITIZER [J].
BASKETTER, DA ;
SCHOLES, EW ;
WAHLKVIST, H ;
MONTELIUS, J .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1995, 33 (01) :28-32
[4]  
Basketter DA, 1999, J APPL TOXICOL, V19, P261, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1263(199907/08)19:4<261::AID-JAT572>3.3.CO
[5]  
2-X
[6]  
Dearman RJ, 1998, J APPL TOXICOL, V18, P281, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1263(199807/08)18:4<281::AID-JAT506>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-4
[8]  
Dearman RJ, 1999, J APPL TOXICOL, V19, P299, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1263(199909/10)19:5<299::AID-JAT591>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-C
[10]  
*ECETOC, 1999, 78 ECETOC