Conservation planning under climate change: Toward accounting for uncertainty in predicted species distributions to increase confidence in conservation investments in space and time

被引:169
作者
Carvalho, Silvia B. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Brito, Jose C. [1 ]
Crespo, Eduardo G. [2 ,5 ]
Watts, Matthew E. [3 ]
Possingham, Hugh P. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Porto, CIBIO Ctr Invest Biodiversidad & Recursos Genet, P-4485661 Vairao, Portugal
[2] Univ Lisbon, Fac Ciencias, Dept Biol Anim, P-1749016 Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Univ Queensland, Ctr Ecol, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[4] Univ Queensland, Sch Math & Phys, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[5] Univ Lisbon, CBA, Ctr Biol Ambiental, P-1749016 Lisbon, Portugal
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Global warming; Return-on-investment; Marxan; Conservation prioritization; Scenario analysis; Iberian Peninsula; DISTRIBUTION MODELS; RESERVE-SELECTION; EXTINCTION RISK; AREAS; COSTS; BIODIVERSITY; SCENARIOS; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2011.04.024
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Climate warming challenges our approach to building systems of protected areas because it is likely to drive accelerating shifts in species distributions, and the projections of those future species distributions are uncertain. There are several important sources of uncertainty intrinsic to using species occurrence projections for reserve system design including uncertainty in the number of occurrences captured by any reserve selection solution, and uncertainty arising from the different approaches used to fit predictive models. Here we used the present and future predicted distributions of Iberian herptiles to analyze how dynamics and uncertainty in species distributions may affect decisions about resource allocation for conservation in space and time. We identified priority areas maximizing coverage of current and future (2020 and 2080) predicted distributions of 65 species, under "Mild" and "Severe" uncertainty. Next, we applied a return-on-investment analysis to quantify and make explicit trade-offs between investing in areas selected when optimizing for different times and with different uncertainty levels. Areas identified as important for conservation in every time frame and uncertainty level were the ones considered to be robust climate adaptation investments, and included chiefly already protected areas. Areas identified only under "Mild" uncertainty were considered good candidates for investment if extra resources are available and were mainly located in northern Iberia. However, areas selected only in the "Severe" uncertainty case should not be completely disregarded as they may become climatic refugia for some species. Our study provides an objective methodology to deliver "no regrets" conservation investments. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2020 / 2030
页数:11
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   Opportunity costs: Who really pays for conservation? [J].
Adams, Vanessa M. ;
Pressey, Robert L. ;
Naidoo, Robin .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2010, 143 (02) :439-448
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, WORLD DAT PROT AR WD
[3]   Climate warming and the decline of amphibians and reptiles in Europe [J].
Araujo, M. B. ;
Thuiller, W. ;
Pearson, R. G. .
JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2006, 33 (10) :1712-1728
[4]  
Araujo M.B., 2009, Spatial conservation prioritization: Quantitative methods and computational tools, P172
[5]  
Araujo M.B., 2009, CONV CONS EUR WILDL, P28
[6]   Selecting areas for species persistence using occurrence data [J].
Araújo, MB ;
Williams, PH .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2000, 96 (03) :331-345
[7]   Reducing uncertainty in projections of extinction risk from climate change [J].
Araújo, MB ;
Whittaker, RJ ;
Ladle, RJ ;
Erhard, M .
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2005, 14 (06) :529-538
[8]   Would climate change drive species out of reserves?: An assessment of existing reserve-selection methods [J].
Araújo, MB ;
Cabeza, M ;
Thuiller, W ;
Hannah, L ;
Williams, PH .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2004, 10 (09) :1618-1626
[9]   Ensemble forecasting of species distributions [J].
Araujo, Miguel B. ;
New, Mark .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2007, 22 (01) :42-47
[10]  
Ball I.R., 2009, SPATIAL CONSERVATION, P185, DOI DOI 10.1111/EVA.12631