Understanding the diagnostic capabilities of cognitive tests

被引:40
作者
Ivnik, RJ
Smith, GE
Cerhan, JH
Boeve, BF
Tangalos, EG
Petersen, RC
机构
[1] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Dept Psychiat & Psychol W 11 B, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Dept Neurol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Div Community Internal Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
来源
CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST | 2001年 / 15卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1076/clin.15.1.114.1904
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Statistics (i.e., sensitivity, specificity, hit rates, positive and negative predictive values, odds ratios, and likelihood ratios) that best describe a diagnostic test's ability to classify persons as either "impaired" or "normal," but that are not commonly reported in neuropsychological research, are reviewed. These statistics are applied to Mayo Cognitive Factor Scale scores (MCFS; Smith et al., 1994) to demonstrate information that can be acquired about the diagnostic capabilities of cognitive tests as they are commonly used in clinical settings. Multivariate analyses then generated a statistical model that combines MCFS scores and improves on the diagnostic capabilities of the individual MCFS scores. This model enjoys better diagnostic power than individual scores. It establishes that cognitive testing that uses multiple measures is very good at differentiating normal from impaired cognitive states. Information is also provided that helps clinicians quantify a person's risk for cognitive impairment based on specific cognitive test score(s).
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 124
页数:11
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PSYCHOL ASSESS, DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.4.4.433
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1987, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU, V4th
[3]   Use of the odds ratio to translate neuropsychological test scores into real-world outcomes: From statistical significance to clinical significance [J].
Bieliauskas, LA ;
Fastenau, PS ;
Lacy, MA ;
Roper, BL .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 19 (06) :889-896
[4]  
FLETCHER RH, 1996, CLIN EPIDEMIOLOGY ES, P42
[5]   Memory impairment on free and cued selective reminding predicts dementia [J].
Grober, E ;
Lipton, RB ;
Hall, C ;
Crystal, H .
NEUROLOGY, 2000, 54 (04) :827-832
[6]  
Ivnik R.J., 1992, Clinical Neuropsychologist, V6, P1, DOI DOI 10.1080/13854049208401877
[7]  
Ivnik R.J., 1992, CLIN NEUROPSYCHOL, V6, P49, DOI [DOI 10.1080/13854049208401879, 10.1080/13854049208401879]
[8]  
Ivnik R.J., 1992, CLIN NEUROPSYCHOL, V6, P83, DOI [10.1080/13854049608406689, DOI 10.1080/13854049208401880, 10.1080/13854049208401880]
[9]   Diagnostic accuracy of four approaches to interpreting neuropsychological test data [J].
Ivnik, RJ ;
Smith, GE ;
Petersen, RC ;
Boeve, BF ;
Kokmen, E ;
Tangalos, EG .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 14 (02) :163-177
[10]   Free and cued selective reminding test: MOANS norms [J].
Ivnik, RJ ;
Smith, GE ;
Lucas, JA ;
Tangalos, EG ;
Kokmen, E ;
Petersen, RC .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 19 (05) :676-691