Modeling of flux decline during crossflow ultrafiltration of colloidal suspensions

被引:138
作者
Lee, Y [1 ]
Clark, MM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
ultrafiltration; concentration polarization; diffusion; flux decline; specific cake resistance;
D O I
10.1016/S0376-7388(98)00177-X
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Mass transfer during crossflow ultrafiltration is mathematically expressed using the two-dimensional convective-diffusion equation. Numerical simulations showed that mass transfer in crossflow filtration quickly reaches a steady-state for constant boundary conditions. Hence, the unsteady nature of the permeate flux decline must be caused by changes in the hydraulic boundary condition at the membrane surface due to cake formation during filtration. A step-wise pseudo steady-state model was developed to predict the flux decline due to concentration polarization during crossflow ultrafiltration. An iterative algorithm was employed to predict the amount of flux decline for each finite time interval until the true steady-state permeate flux is established. For model verification, crossflow filtration of monodisperse polystyrene latex suspensions ranging from 0.064 to 2.16 mu m in diameter was studied under constant transmembrane pressure mode. Besides the crossflow filtration tests, dead-end filtration tests were also carried out to independently determine a model parameter, the specific cake resistance. Another model parameter, the effective diffusion coefficient, is defined as the sum of molecular and shear-induced hydrodynamic diffusion coefficients. The step-wise pseudo steady-state model predictions are in good agreement with experimental results of flux decline during crossflow ultrafiltration of colloidal suspensions. Experimental variations in particle size, feed concentration, and crossflow velocity were also effectively modeled. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 202
页数:22
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   FACTORS AFFECTING FLUX IN CROSS-FLOW FILTRATION [J].
BAKER, RJ ;
FANE, AG ;
FELL, CJD ;
YOO, BH .
DESALINATION, 1985, 53 (1-3) :81-93
[2]   LAMINAR FLOW IN CHANNELS WITH POROUS WALLS [J].
BERMAN, AS .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 1953, 24 (09) :1232-1235
[3]  
CHELLAM S, 1991, AWWA SEM P, P675
[4]   FLOC RESTRUCTURING IN VARIED TURBULENT MIXING [J].
CLARK, MM ;
FLORA, JRV .
JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 1991, 147 (02) :407-421
[5]  
CLARK MM, 1995, REMOVAL COLLOIDAL MA
[6]  
CLARK MM, 1994, REMOVAL COLLOIDAL MA
[7]   HYDRODYNAMIC MODEL AND EXPERIMENTS FOR CROSS-FLOW MICROFILTRATION [J].
DAVIS, RH ;
BIRDSELL, SA .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING COMMUNICATIONS, 1987, 49 (4-6) :217-234
[8]   SHEAR-INDUCED TRANSPORT OF A PARTICLE LAYER ALONG A POROUS WALL [J].
DAVIS, RH ;
LEIGHTON, DT .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 1987, 42 (02) :275-281
[9]   MODELING OF FOULING OF CROSS-FLOW MICROFILTRATION MEMBRANES [J].
DAVIS, RH .
SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION METHODS, 1992, 21 (02) :75-126
[10]   KINETICS OF DEPOSITION OF COLLOIDAL PARTICLES IN POROUS-MEDIA [J].
ELIMELECH, M ;
OMELIA, CR .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1990, 24 (10) :1528-1536