Effect of dengue vector control interventions on entomological parameters in developing countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:138
作者
Erlanger, T. E. [1 ]
Keiser, J. [2 ]
Utzinger, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Trop Inst, Dept Publ Hlth & Epidemiol, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland
[2] Swiss Trop Inst, Dept Med Parasitol & Infect Biol, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Aedes; biological control; chemical control; dengue; effectiveness; environmental management; intearated vector management; meta-analysis; systematic review; vector control;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2915.2008.00740.x
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this review was to compare the effects of different dengue vector control interventions (i.e. biological control, chemical control, environmental management and integrated vector management) with respect to the following entomological parameters: Breteau index (BI), container index (0), and house index (HI). We systematically searched PubMed, ISI Web of Science, Science Direct, the Den.-Lie Bulletin of the World Health Organization and reference lists of retrieved articles on dengue vector control interventions in developing Countries. We extracted data oil the effectiveness of different dengue vector control interventions (defined as the relative reduction of an entomological measure caused by the intervention compared with the control or pre-intervention phase) and calculated a measure of combined relative effectiveness, with 95% confidence intervals (95% c.i.). We identified 56 publications covering 61 dengue vector control interventions. Integrated vector management was found to be the most effective method to reduce the CI, HI and BI, resulting in random combined relative effectiveness values of 0.12 (95% c.i. 0.02-0.62), 0.17 (95% c.i. 0.02-1.28) and 0.33 (95% c.i. 0.22-0.48), respectively. Environmental management showed a relatively low effectiveness of 0.71 (95% c.i. 0.55-0.90) for the BI, 0.49 (95% c.i. 0.30-0.79) for the Cl and 0.43 (95%c.i. 0.31-0.59) for the HI. Biological control (relative effectiveness for the CI: 0. 18) usually targeted a small number of people (median population size: 200; range 20-2500), whereas integrated vector management focused on larger populations (median: 12450; range: 210-9600000). In conclusion, dengue vector control is effective in reducing vector populations, particularly when interventions use a community-based, integrated approach, which is tailored to local eco-epidemiological and Sociocultural settings and combined with educational programmes to increase knowledge and understanding of best practice. New research should assess the density-dependent effectiveness of each control measure in order to estimate whether reducing vector numbers has an impact oil dengue transmission when populations are at a critical threshold.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 221
页数:19
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1982, MAN ENV MAN MOSQ CON
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, WORLD HLTH REPORT 20
[3]  
[Anonymous], HUM DEV REP 2007 200
[4]  
Armada Gessa JA, 1986, B PAN AM HLTH ORG, V20, P186
[5]   Cost effectiveness of Aedes aegypti control programmes:: participatory versus vertical [J].
Baly, A. ;
Toledo, M. E. ;
Boelaert, M. ;
Reyes, A. ;
Vanlerberghe, V. ;
Ceballos, E. ;
Carvajal, M. ;
Maso, R. ;
La Rosa, M. ;
Denis, O. ;
Van der Stuyft, P. .
TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2007, 101 (06) :578-586
[6]  
BANG YH, 1972, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V46, P554
[7]  
BANG YH, 1972, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V46, P416
[8]  
BUTRAPORN P, 1999, DENGUE B, V2, P1
[9]   Impact of vector control on a dengue fever outbreak in Trinidad, West Indies, in 1998 [J].
Chadee, DD ;
Williams, FLR ;
Kitron, UD .
TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH, 2005, 10 (08) :748-754
[10]  
CHAN KL, 1987, WORLD HEALTH FORUM, V8, P101