TRAIT AND BEHAVIORAL THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP: AN INTEGRATION AND META-ANALYTIC TEST OF THEIR RELATIVE VALIDITY

被引：761

作者：

DeRue, D. Scott ^{[1
]}

Nahrgang, Jennifer D. ^{[2
]}

Wellman, Ned ^{[1
]}

Humphrey, Stephen E. ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Michigan, Stephen M Ross Sch Business, 701 Tappan St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA

[2] Arizona State Univ, WP Carey Sch Business, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA

[3] Penn State Univ, Smeal Coll Business, University Pk, PA 16802 USA

来源：

PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY | 2011年 / 64卷 / 01期

关键词：

5 PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS; SEX-DIFFERENCES; TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP; TRANSACTIONAL LEADERSHIP; CHARISMATIC LEADERSHIP; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; EMPOWERING LEADERSHIP; LEARNING ORIENTATION; INITIATING STRUCTURE; JOB-PERFORMANCE;

D O I：

10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01201.x

中图分类号：

B849 [应用心理学];

学科分类号：

040203 ;

摘要：

The leadership literature suffers from a lack of theoretical integration (Avolio, 2007, American Psychologist, 62, 25-33). This article addresses that lack of integration by developing an integrative trait-behavioral model of leadership effectiveness and then examining the relative validity of leader traits (gender, intelligence, personality) and behaviors (transformational-transactional, initiating structure-consideration) across 4 leadership effectiveness criteria (leader effectiveness, group performance, follower job satisfaction, satisfaction with leader). Combined, leader traits and behaviors explain a minimum of 31% of the variance in leadership effectiveness criteria. Leader behaviors tend to explain more variance in leadership effectiveness than leader traits, but results indicate that an integrative model where leader behaviors mediate the relationship between leader traits and effectiveness is warranted.

引用

页码：7 / 52

页数：46

共 163 条

[1] Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits [J].

Ackerman, PL ;

Heggestad, ED .

PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1997, 121 (02) :219-245

[2] THE ROUTINE MAY BE STABLE BUT THE ADVANTAGE IS NOT: COMPETITIVE IMPLICATIONS OF KEY EMPLOYEE MOBILITY [J].

Aime, Federico ;

Johnson, Scott ;

Ridge, Jason W. ;

Hill, Aaron D. .

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2010, 31 (01) :75-87

[3]

[Anonymous], 1869, Hereditary genius

[4]

Arnold JA, 2000, J ORGAN BEHAV, V21, P249, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200005)21:3<249::AID-JOB10>3.0.CO

[5]

2-#

[6] PERSONAL ATTRIBUTES AS PREDICTORS OF SUPERIORS AND SUBORDINATES PERCEPTIONS OF MILITARY ACADEMY LEADERSHIP [J].

ATWATER, LE ;

YAMMARINO, FJ .

HUMAN RELATIONS, 1993, 46 (05) :645-668

[7]

Avolio B.J., 2003, HDB PSYCHOL, V12, P277

[8] Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire [J].

Avolio, BJ ;

Bass, BM ;

Jung, DI .

JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 72 :441-462

[9] Promoting more integrative strategies for leadership theory-building [J].

Avolio, Bruce J. .

AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2007, 62 (01) :25-33

[10] A Meta-Analysis of 25 Years of Mood-Creativity Research: Hedonic Tone, Activation, or Regulatory Focus? [J].

Baas, Matthijs ;

De Dreu, Carsten K. W. ;

Nijstad, Bernard A. .

PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2008, 134 (06) :779-806

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 →