Tylosin sorption to silty clay loam soils, swine manure, and sand

被引:24
作者
Clay, SA [1 ]
Liu, Z
Thaler, R
Kennouche, H
机构
[1] S Dakota State Univ, Dept Plant Sci, Brookings, SD 57007 USA
[2] S Dakota State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Brookings, SD 57007 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
antimicrobial sorption; partition coefficient; batch sorption; desorption; sorption isotherms;
D O I
10.1080/03601230500227533
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The objectives of this study were to assess sorption and desorption of tylosin, a macrolide antimicrobial chemical used in swine, cattle, and poultry production, in three silty clay loam soils of South Dakota and compare soil sorption to sand and manure sorption The silty clay loam soils, from a toposequence in eastern South Dakota, standardized sand samples, and swine manure were used in 24-h batch sorption studies with tylosin, concentrations ranging from 25 to 232 mu mole/L. Desorption from soil was conducted over a four-day period. Partition coefficients, based on the Freundlich isotherm (K-f) or K-d values, were calculated. K-f values for the silty clay loams were similar, not influenced by landscape position, and averaged 1350 with isotherm slopes ranging from 0.85 to 0.93. K-f values for sand were dependent on solution/sand ratios and pH, ranging from 1.4 to 25.1. K-d values of manure were dependent on the solution type and ranged from 840 L/kg with urine to about 175 L/kg when sorbed from water. Desorption of tylosin from each soil over the four-day period was < 0.2% of the amount added. The soils' high K-f values and low desorption amounts suggest that once tylosin is in these soils, leaching to lower depths may not occur. However, this does not preclude runoff with soil eroded particles. If tylosin reaches a sand aquifer, through bypass flow or other mechanism(s), movement in the aquifer most likely would occur.
引用
收藏
页码:841 / 850
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Sorption and degradation of alachlor in soil and aquifer material [J].
Clay, SA ;
Moorman, TB ;
Clay, DE ;
Scholes, KA .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1997, 26 (05) :1348-1353
[2]  
DeSutter TM, 2003, WEED SCI, V51, P456, DOI 10.1614/0043-1745(2003)051[0456:ASADAA]2.0.CO
[3]  
2
[4]  
Dewey CE, 1999, SWINE HEALTH PROD, V7, P19
[5]  
*EL PROD CO, 1982, TYL INJ VET TECH HDB
[6]  
Frostegard A, 1997, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V63, P2224
[7]  
GUPTA S, 2003, ANTIBIOTIC LOSSES RU
[8]   Occurrence, fate and effects of pharmaceutical substances in the environment - A review [J].
Halling-Sorensen, B ;
Nielsen, SN ;
Lanzky, PF ;
Ingerslev, F ;
Lutzhoft, HCH ;
Jorgensen, SE .
CHEMOSPHERE, 1998, 36 (02) :357-394
[9]  
Hamscher G, 2000, DEUT TIERARZTL WOCH, V107, P332
[10]   Furor over animal antibiotic use [J].
Hileman, B .
CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2001, 79 (08) :47-+