Whole systems appraisal of a UK Building Integrated Photovoltaic (BIPV) system: Energy, environmental, and economic evaluations

被引:102
作者
Hammond, Geoffrey P. [1 ,2 ]
Harajli, Hassan A. [1 ,3 ]
Jones, Craig I. [1 ]
Winnett, Adrian B. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bath, Dept Mech Engn, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
[2] Univ Bath, ISEE, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
[3] Univ Bath, Dept Econ & Int Dev, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Economic appraisal; Environmental Impact; Photovoltaic system; DOMESTIC MICRO-GENERATION; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; TECHNOLOGIES; PERFORMANCE; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.048
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Energy analysis, environmental life-cycle assessment (LCA) and economic appraisals have been utilised to study the performance of a domestic building integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) system on a 'whole systems' basis. Energy analysis determined that the system paid back its embodied energy in just 4.5 years. LCA revealed that the embodied impacts were offset by the electricity generated to provide a net environmental benefit in most categories. Only carcinogens, ecotoxicity and minerals had a small net lifetime burden. A financial analysis was undertaken from the householder's perspective, alongside cost-benefit analysis from a societal perspective. The results of both indicated that the systems are unlikely to pay back their investment over the 25 year lifetime. However, the UK is in an important period (2010/11) of policy transition with a move away from the 'technology subsidies' of the Low Carbon Buildings Programme (LCBP) and towards a 'market development policy' of feed-in tariffs. Representing the next stage on an innovation S-curve this is expected to facilitate rapid PV uptake, as experienced in countries such as Germany, Denmark, and Spain. The results of the present study clearly demonstrate the importance of the new government support scheme to the future uptake of BIPV. (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 230
页数:12
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Prospects for and barriers to domestic micro-generation: A United Kingdom perspective [J].
Allen, S. R. ;
Hammond, G. P. ;
McManus, M. C. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2008, 85 (06) :528-544
[2]  
[Anonymous], SIMAPRO LIF CYCL ASS
[3]  
[Anonymous], LOW CARB BUILD PROGR
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, VROM ZOETERMEER
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1978, ENERGY EC
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2006, 14044 ISO
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2008, PROC I CIVIL ENGRS E
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2006, 140402006 EN ISO
[9]   Urban energy generation: The added value of photovoltaics in social housing [J].
Bahaj, A. S. ;
James, P. A. B. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2007, 11 (09) :2121-2136
[10]  
Baumann H., 2004, HITCH HIKERS GUIDE L