Too Much of a Good Thing: The Challenge and Opportunity of the Inverted U

被引:444
作者
Grant, Adam M. [1 ]
Schwartz, Barry [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Swarthmore Coll, Dept Psychol, Swarthmore, PA 19081 USA
关键词
happiness; success; well-being; curvilinear; inverted U; nonmonotonic; POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY; SELF-EFFICACY; CURVILINEAR RELATIONSHIPS; OUTCOME SATISFACTION; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; DECISION-PROCESSES; STEREOTYPE THREAT; CHOICE OVERLOAD; JOB SCOPE; DARK SIDE;
D O I
10.1177/1745691610393523
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Aristotle proposed that to achieve happiness and success, people should cultivate virtues at mean or intermediate levels between deficiencies and excesses. In stark contrast to this assertion that virtues have costs at high levels, a wealth of psychological research has focused on demonstrating the well-being and performance benefits of positive traits, states, and experiences. This focus has obscured the prevalence and importance of nonmonotonic inverted-U-shaped effects, whereby positive phenomena reach inflection points at which their effects turn negative. We trace the evidence for nonmonotonic effects in psychology and provide recommendations for conceptual and empirical progress. We conclude that for psychology in general and positive psychology in particular, Aristotle's idea of the mean may serve as a useful guide for developing both a descriptive and a prescriptive account of happiness and success.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 76
页数:16
相关论文
共 152 条
[1]   What breaks a leader: The curvilinear relation between assertiveness and leadership [J].
Ames, Daniel R. ;
Flynn, Francis J. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 92 (02) :307-324
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Handbook of psychology: Personality and social psychology, DOI [10.1002/0471264385.wei0519, DOI 10.1002/0471264385.WEI0519]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Positive Organizational Scholarship
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1999, NICOMACHEAN ETHICS, V2nd
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1993, LOST LAWYER FAILING
[6]   Wisdom -: A metaheuristic (pragmatic) to orchestrate mind and virtue toward excellence [J].
Baltes, PB ;
Staudinger, UM .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2000, 55 (01) :122-135
[7]   Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited [J].
Bandura, A ;
Locke, EA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 88 (01) :87-99
[8]   The Structure of Intraindividual Value Change [J].
Bardi, Anat ;
Lee, Julie Anne ;
Hofmann-Towfigh, Nadi ;
Soutar, Geoffrey .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 97 (05) :913-929
[9]   Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness [J].
Barrick, MR ;
Stewart, GL ;
Neubert, MJ ;
Mount, MK .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 83 (03) :377-391
[10]   Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: The role of personality [J].
Barry, B ;
Stewart, GL .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 82 (01) :62-78