A Collaborative Enterprise for Multi-Stakeholder Participation in the Advancement of Quantitative Imaging

被引:139
作者
Buckler, Andrew J. [1 ]
Bresolin, Linda [2 ]
Dunnick, N. Reed [3 ]
Sullivan, Daniel C. [4 ]
机构
[1] Buckler Biomed LLC, Wenham, MA 01984 USA
[2] Radiol Soc N Amer, Oak Brook, IL USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Duke Univ, Durham, NC USA
关键词
TUMOR CHANGE MEASUREMENT; LUNG-CANCER; TRUTH DATA; THERAPY; BIOMARKER; FDA; WORKSHOP; CT;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.10100799
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Medical imaging has seen substantial and rapid technical advances during the past decade, including advances in image acquisition devices, processing and analysis software, and agents to enhance specificity. Traditionally, medical imaging has defined anatomy, but increasingly newer, more advanced, imaging technologies provide biochemical and physiologic information based on both static and dynamic modalities. These advanced technologies are important not only for detecting disease but for characterizing and assessing change of disease with time or therapy. Because of the rapidity of these advances, research to determine the utility of quantitative imaging in either clinical research or clinical practice has not had time to mature. Methods to appropriately develop, assess, regulate, and reimburse must be established for these advanced technologies. Efficient and methodical processes that meet the needs of stakeholders in the biomedical research community, therapeutics developers, and health care delivery enterprises will ultimately benefit individual patients. To help address this, the authors formed a collaborative program-the Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance. This program draws from the very successful precedent set by the Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise effort but is adapted to the needs of imaging science. Strategic guidance supporting the development, qualification, and deployment of quantitative imaging biomarkers will lead to improved standardization of imaging tests, proof of imaging test performance, and greater use of imaging to predict the biologic behavior of tissue and monitor therapy response. These, in turn, confer value to corporate stakeholders, providing incentives to bring new and innovative products to market.
引用
收藏
页码:906 / 914
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], QUANTITATIVE IMAGING
[2]   The Reference Image Database to Evaluate Response to therapy in lung cancer (RIDER) project: A resource for the development of change-analysis software [J].
Armato, S. G., III ;
Meyer, C. R. ;
McNitt-Gray, M. F. ;
McLennan, G. ;
Reeves, A. P. ;
Croft, B. Y. ;
Clarke, L. P. .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2008, 84 (04) :448-456
[3]   Cancerous Breast Lesions on Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Images: Computerized Characterization for Image-based Prognostic Markers [J].
Bhooshan, Neha ;
Giger, Maryellen L. ;
Jansen, Sanaz A. ;
Li, Hui ;
Lan, Li ;
Newstead, Gillian M. .
RADIOLOGY, 2010, 254 (03) :680-690
[4]  
Buckler A., 2009, IEEE APPL IM PATT RE, P14
[5]  
BUCKLER AJ, RADIOLOGY IN PRESS
[6]   Volumetric CT in Lung Cancer: An Example for the Qualification of Imaging as a Biomarker [J].
Buckler, Andrew J. ;
Mozley, P. David ;
Schwartz, Lawrence ;
Petrick, Nicholas ;
McNitt-Gray, Michael ;
Fenimore, Charles ;
O'Donnell, Kevin ;
Hayes, Wendy ;
Kim, Hyun J. ;
Clarke, Laurence ;
Sullivan, Daniel .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2010, 17 (01) :107-115
[7]   Imaging as a biomarker - Standards for change measurements in therapy workshop summary [J].
Clarke, Laurence P. ;
Sriram, Ram D. ;
Schilling, Linda Beth .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2008, 15 (04) :501-530
[8]   Quantitative Imaging for Evaluation of Response to Cancer Therapy [J].
Clarke, Laurence P. ;
Croft, Barbara S. ;
Nordstrom, Robert ;
Zhang, Huiming ;
Kelloff, Gary ;
Tatum, J. .
TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 2 (04) :195-197
[9]  
Croft BY, 2008, J NUCL MED, V49, p40N
[10]   New imaging approaches for understanding lung cancer response to treatment [J].
de Ryk, J. ;
Namati, E. ;
Thiesse, J. ;
McLennan, G. .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2008, 84 (04) :517-522