Characterisation and dissolution of depleted uranium aerosols produced during impacts of kinetic energy penetrators against a tank

被引:30
作者
Chazel, V
Gerasimo, P
Dabouis, V
Laroche, P
Paquet, F
机构
[1] LEAR, Inst Radioprotect & Surete Nucl, Dept Protect Sante Homme & Dosimetr, Serv Dosimetr, F-26702 Pierrelatte, France
[2] Serv Protect Radiol Armees, Lab Controle Radiotoxicol, F-92141 Clamart, France
[3] Ctr Rech, Serv Sante Armees, Biophys Unit, F-38702 La Tronche, France
关键词
D O I
10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006214
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Aerosols produced during impacts of depleted uranium (DU) penetrators against the glacis (sloping armour) and the turret of a tank were sampled. The concentration and size distribution were determined. Activity median aerodynamic diameters were 1 mum (geometric standard deviation, sigma(g) = 3.7) and 2 mum (sigma(g) = 2.5), respectively, for glacis and turret. The mean air concentration was 120 Bq m(-3), i.e. 8.5 rng m(-3) of DU. Filters analysed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X ray diffraction showed two types of particles (fine particles and large molten particles) composed mainly of a mixture of uranium and aluminium. The uranium oxides were mostly U3O8, UO2.25 and probably UO3.01 and a mixed compound of U and Al. The kinetics of dissolution in three media (HCO3-, HCl and Gamble's solution) were determined using in-vitro tests. The slow dissolution rates were respectively slow, and intermediate between slow and moderate, and the rapid dissolution fractions were mostly intermediate between moderate and fast. According to the in-vitro results for Gamble's solution, and based on a hypothetical single acute inhalation of 90 Bq, effective doses integrated up to 1 y after incorporation were 0.54 and 0.56 mSv, respectively, for aerosols from glacis and turret. In comparison, the ICRP limits are 20 mSv y(-1) for workers and 1 mSv y(-1) for members of the public. A kidney concentration of approximately 0.1 mug U g(-1) was predicted and should not, in this case, lead to kidney damage.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 166
页数:4
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
*AM NAT STAND, 1996, 13221995 HPS AM NAT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, ICRP PUBL
[3]   Effect of U308 specific surface area on in vitro dissolution, biokinetics, and dose coefficients [J].
Chazel, V ;
Houpert, P ;
Ansoborlo, E .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 1998, 79 (1-4) :39-42
[4]   Effect of absorption parameters on calculation of the dose coefficient: Example of classification of industrial uranium compounds [J].
Chazel, V ;
Houpert, P ;
Paquet, F ;
Ansoborlo, E .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2001, 94 (03) :261-268
[5]   THE EFFECT OF SOLUBILITY ON INHALED URANIUM COMPOUND CLEARANCE - A REVIEW [J].
EIDSON, AF .
HEALTH PHYSICS, 1994, 67 (01) :1-14
[6]  
International Commission of Radiological Protection (ICRP), 1994, ANN ICRP, V24
[7]  
International Commission on Radiological Protection ICRP, 1995, ICRP PUBL, V68
[8]  
JARVIS N, 1996, ICRP PUBLICATION, V66
[9]   MEASUREMENT OF IN-VITRO DISSOLUTION OF AEROSOL PARTICLES FOR COMPARISON TO IN-VIVO DISSOLUTION IN LOWER RESPIRATORY TRACT AFTER INHALATION [J].
KANAPILLY, GM ;
RAABE, OG ;
GOH, CHT ;
CHIMENTI, RA .
HEALTH PHYSICS, 1973, 24 (05) :497-+
[10]   THE BEHAVIOR AND CHEMICAL TOXICITY OF U IN THE KIDNEY - A REASSESSMENT [J].
LEGGETT, RW .
HEALTH PHYSICS, 1989, 57 (03) :365-383