Poor durability of carotid angioplasty and stenting for treatment of recurrent artery stenosis after carotid endarterectomy: An institutional experience

被引:70
作者
Leger, AR
Neale, M
Harris, JP
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Dept Surg, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[3] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Portland, OR USA
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mva.2001.113485
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Recurrent stenosis after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is often regarded as an optimal application of carotid artery angioplasty and stenting (CAS). The extended durability of CAS for recurrent carotid artery stenosis after CEA is unknown. We present the intermediate-term surveillance results for all eight CAS procedures performed over a 28-month period at a single tertiary referral center. Methods: Patients had recurrent carotid stenosis after CEA, whether symptomatic or asymptomatic, of 80% to 99% stenosis on preprocedural carotid duplex scan examination. Uncovered, self-expanding metal stents, in conjunction with angioplasty, were used in all patients. Baseline and scheduled interval follow-up duplex ultrasound scan was used to assess intrastent restenosis. Further angiography was reserved for those patients obtaining additional intervention. Results:One transient ischemic attack was observed 1 day after the procedure, and no cerebral infarct occurred. All patients had angiographic resolution of the stenosis and postprocedural duplex scan studies without residual stenosis. Subsequent interval surveillance duplex scan examinations revealed significant (60%-79%) to critical (80%-99%) recurrent stenosis in six (75%) of eight patients, two of whom went on to further interventions. Of those with intrastent restenosis, four (75%) progressed to critical (80%-99%) stenosis. Mean follow-up was 20.2 months (range, 12-37 months). The two lesions that have not yet shown restenosis are those with the shortest follow-up interval, each at 12 months. Conclusions: In contrast to the optimistic claims in other series, this limited series suggests that angioplasty with stenting for recurrent carotid artery occlusive disease after CEA, although relatively safe in the short term, has significant limitations in terms of durability of results.
引用
收藏
页码:1008 / 1014
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]
Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis [J].
Barnett, HJM ;
Taylor, W ;
Eliasziw, M ;
Fox, AJ ;
Ferguson, GG ;
Haynes, RB ;
Rankin, RN ;
Clagett, GP ;
Hachinski, VC ;
Sackett, DL ;
Thorpe, KE ;
Meldrum, HE ;
Spence, JD .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 339 (20) :1415-1425
[2]
Bergeron P, 1996, J ENDOVASC SURG, V3, P76, DOI 10.1583/1074-6218(1996)003<0076:RCDWSB>2.0.CO
[3]
2
[4]
CITRIT DF, 1998, SURG CLIN N AM, V78, P593
[5]
Evolving indications for and early results of carotid artery stenting [J].
Criado, FJ ;
Wellons, E ;
Clark, NS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1997, 174 (02) :111-114
[6]
COMPLICATIONS OF CEREBRAL-ANGIOGRAPHY IN PATIENTS WITH SYMPTOMATIC CAROTID TERRITORY ISCHEMIA SCREENED BY CAROTID ULTRASOUND [J].
DAVIES, KN ;
HUMPHREY, PR .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1993, 56 (09) :967-972
[7]
TRANS-LUMINAL DILATATION OF INTERNAL CAROTID-ARTERY IN FIBROMUSCULAR DYSPLASIA - A PRELIMINARY-REPORT [J].
GARRIDO, E ;
MONTOYA, J .
SURGICAL NEUROLOGY, 1981, 16 (06) :469-471
[8]
LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP AND CLINICAL OUTCOME OF CAROTID RESTENOSIS [J].
HEALY, DA ;
ZIERLER, E ;
NICHOLLS, SC ;
CLOWES, AW ;
PRIMOZICH, JF ;
BERGELIN, RO ;
STRANDNESS, DE .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1989, 10 (06) :662-669
[9]
The natural history of early recurrent carotid artery stenosis [J].
Johnson, CA ;
Tollefson, DFJ ;
Olsen, SB ;
Andersen, CA ;
McKee-Johnson, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 177 (05) :433-436
[10]
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stent placement for recurrent carotid artery stenosis [J].
Lanzino, G ;
Mericle, RA ;
Lopes, DK ;
Wakhloo, AK ;
Guterman, LR ;
Hopkins, LN .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1999, 90 (04) :688-694