Juggling law, ethics, and intuition: practical answers to awkward questions

被引:14
作者
Sommerville, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Eth Dept, London WC1H 9JR, England
关键词
D O I
10.1136/jme.29.5.281
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The eclectic problem solving methodology used by the British Medical Association (BMA) is described in this paper. It has grown from the daily need to respond to doctors' practical queries and incorporates reference to law, traditional professional codes, and established BMA policies-all of which must be regularly assessed against the benchmark of contemporary societal expectations. The two Jehovah's Witness scenarios are analysed, using this methodology and in both cases the four principles solution is found to concur with that of the BMA's approach. The author's overall conclusion is that although the BMA resorts to a lengthier list of thins to consider, the solutions that emerge are often likely to coincide with the four principles approach.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 286
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Principles of Health Care Ethics
[2]  
*BMA, 2001, MED PROF HUM RIGHTS, pCH7
[3]  
*BMA, 2000, IMP HUM RIGHTS ACT 1
[4]  
*BMA, 1981, HDB MED ETH, P33
[5]  
*BMA, 1998, HUM GEN CHOIC RESP
[6]  
BOYD KM, 1997, NEW DICT MED ETHICS, P113
[7]  
Bristol Royal Infirmary Inquiry, 2000, INQ MAN CAR CHILDR R
[8]  
General Medical Council, 1998, SEEK PAT CONS ETH CO
[9]   Four scenarios [J].
Gillon, R .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2003, 29 (05) :267-268
[10]  
GILLON R, 1985, PHILOS MED ETHICS, P2