Comparative assessment of antibiotic susceptibility of coagulase-negative staphylococci in biofilm versus planktonic culture as assessed by bacterial enumeration or rapid XTT colorimetry

被引:187
作者
Cerca, N
Martins, S
Cerca, F
Jefferson, KK
Pier, GB
Oliveira, R
Azeredo, J
机构
[1] Univ Minho, Ctr Engn Biol, P-4710057 Braga, Portugal
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Channing Lab,Dept Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
nosocomial infections; pathogens; biofilms; antibiotic resistance; CoNS;
D O I
10.1093/jac/dki217
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objectives: To quantitatively compare the antibiotic susceptibility of biofilms formed by the coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus haemolyticus with the susceptibility of planktonic cultures. Methods: Several CoNS strains were grown planktonically or as biofilms to determine the effect of the mode of growth on the level of susceptibility to antibiotics with different mechanisms of action. The utility of a new, rapid colorimetric method that is based on the reduction of a tetrazolium salt (XTT) to measure cell viability was tested by comparison with standard bacterial enumeration techniques. A 6 h kinetic study was performed using dicloxacillin, cefazolin, vancomycin, tetracycline and rifampicin at the peak serum concentration of each antibiotic. Results: In planktonic cells, inhibitors of cell wall synthesis were highly effective over a 3 h period. Biofilms were much less susceptible than planktonic cultures to all antibiotics tested, particularly inhibitors of cell wall synthesis. The susceptibility to inhibitors of protein and RNA synthesis was affected by the biofilm phenotype to a lesser degree. Standard bacterial enumeration techniques and the XTT method produced equivalent results both in biofilms and planktonic assays. Conclusions: This study provides a more accurate comparison between the antibiotic susceptibilities of planktonic versus biofilm populations, because the cell densities in the two populations were similar and because we measured the concentration required to inhibit bacterial metabolism rather than to eradicate the entire bacterial population. While the biofilm phenotype is highly resistant to antibiotics that target cell wall synthesis, it is fairly susceptible to antibiotics that target RNA and protein synthesis.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 336
页数:6
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Antibiotic susceptibility assay for Staphylococcus aureus in biofilms developed in vitro [J].
Amorena, B ;
Gracia, E ;
Monzón, M ;
Leiva, J ;
Oteiza, C ;
Pérez, M ;
Alabart, JL ;
Hernández-Yago, J .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1999, 44 (01) :43-55
[2]   Role of antibiotic penetration limitation in Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilm resistance to ampicillin and ciprofloxacin [J].
Anderl, JN ;
Franklin, MJ ;
Stewart, PS .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2000, 44 (07) :1818-1824
[3]   Effects on antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus epidermidis following adhesion to polymethylmethacrylate and to silicone surfaces [J].
Arciola, CR ;
Campoccia, D ;
Montanaro, L .
BIOMATERIALS, 2002, 23 (06) :1495-1502
[4]   Unexplored reservoirs of pathogenic bacteria: protozoa and biofilms [J].
Brown, MRW ;
Barker, J .
TRENDS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 1999, 7 (01) :46-50
[5]   The relationship between inhibition of bacterial adhesion to a solid surface by sub-MICs of antibiotics and subsequent development of a biofilm [J].
Cerca, N ;
Martins, S ;
Pier, GB ;
Oliveira, R ;
Azeredo, J .
RESEARCH IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 156 (5-6) :650-655
[6]   Quantitative analysis of adhesion and biofilm formation on hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces of clinical isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis [J].
Cerca, N ;
Pier, GB ;
Vilanova, M ;
Oliveira, R ;
Azeredo, J .
RESEARCH IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 156 (04) :506-514
[7]   Comparative evaluation of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) adherence to acrylic by a static method and a parallel-plate flow dynamic method [J].
Cerca, N ;
Pier, GB ;
Oliveira, R ;
Azeredo, J .
RESEARCH IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 155 (09) :755-760
[8]   Influence of batch or fed-batch growth on Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation [J].
Cerca, N ;
Pier, GB ;
Vilanova, M ;
Oliveira, R ;
Azeredo, J .
LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 39 (05) :420-424
[9]   The Calgary Biofilm Device: New technology for rapid determination of antibiotic susceptibilities of bacterial biofilms [J].
Ceri, H ;
Olson, ME ;
Stremick, C ;
Read, RR ;
Morck, D ;
Buret, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1999, 37 (06) :1771-1776
[10]   Bacterial biofilms: A common cause of persistent infections [J].
Costerton, JW ;
Stewart, PS ;
Greenberg, EP .
SCIENCE, 1999, 284 (5418) :1318-1322