Methods of antibiotic instillation in porous orbital implants

被引:8
作者
Badilla, Jaime [1 ]
Dolman, Peter J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Ophthalmol, Eye Care Ctr, Vancouver, BC V5Z 3N9, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1097/IOP.0b013e318177ebc7
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 [眼科学];
摘要
Purpose: Soaking porous implants in antibiotic solution at the time of implantation is often recommended to promote fibrovascular ingrowth and reduce risk of infection. This study evaluated antibiotic penetration in porous implants using different instillation techniques. Methods: Penetration of methylene blue in three 20-mm diameter porous implants (hydroxyapatite, porous polyethylene, and aluminum oxide) was measured using 4 different techniques: 1) soaking in dye for 5 minutes: 2) compressing the implant in dye in a 60-ml syringe for 1 and 2 minutes; 3) aspirating dye through the implants in a 60-ml syringe for 1 and 2 Minutes; and 4) direct injection of dye in the center of the implants. Each implant Was Cut in half to measure penetration in 4 quadrants by 2 independent observers. Results: Soaking the implants for 5 minutes resulted in 6 mm penetration of dye from the surface in hydroxyapatite and no penetration in the others. Compressing or aspirating implants in dye for both 1 minute and 2 minutes resulted in complete penetration to the center in all implants. Direct injection resulted in complete distribution in hydroxyapatite, localized within 4 turn of the injection site in porous polyethylene, and no penetration in aluminum oxide. Conclusions: Best penetration of fluid in all implants was achieved with aspiration or compression within a syringe. If an implant becomes infected, topical instillation of antibiotic is unlikely to reach the sites of infected pores. Direct injection of antibiotic may be helpful for porous implants providing the needle pore does not get blocked while penetrating the implant as it did with the 3 aluminum oxide implants tested in this study.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 289
页数:3
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]
Bilyk J R, 2000, Curr Opin Ophthalmol, V11, P372, DOI 10.1097/00055735-200010000-00015
[2]
The porous polyethylene (Medpor) spherical orbital implant - A retrospective study of 136 cases [J].
Blaydon, SM ;
Shepler, TR ;
Neuhaus, RW ;
White, WL ;
Shore, JW .
OPHTHALMIC PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2003, 19 (05) :364-371
[3]
CHNE WP, 2001, OCULOPLASTICS SURG E, P338
[4]
Porous implant exposure: Incidence, management, and morbidity [J].
Custer, Philip L. ;
Trinkaus, Kathryn M. .
OPHTHALMIC PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2007, 23 (01) :1-7
[5]
CURRENT TECHNIQUES OF ENUCLEATION - A SURVEY OF 5,439 INTRAORBITAL IMPLANTS AND A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE [J].
HORNBLASS, A ;
BIESMAN, BS ;
EVIATAR, JA .
OPHTHALMIC PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1995, 11 (02) :77-86
[6]
Coralline hydroxyapatite orbital implant (Bio-Eye): Experience with 158 patients [J].
Jordan, DR ;
Gilberg, S ;
Bawazeer, A .
OPHTHALMIC PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 20 (01) :69-74
[7]
The bioceramic orbital implant - Experience with 107 implants [J].
Jordan, DR ;
Gilberg, S ;
Mawn, LA .
OPHTHALMIC PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2003, 19 (02) :128-135
[8]
Current trends in managing the anophthalmic socket after primary enucleation and evisceration [J].
Su, GW ;
Yen, MT .
OPHTHALMIC PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 20 (04) :274-280
[9]
Verschueren K, 2001, HDB ENV DATA ORGANIC, Vfourth