Application of Stochastic Multiattribute Analysis to Assessment of Single Walled Carbon Nanotube Synthesis Processes

被引:31
作者
Canis, Laure [1 ]
Linkov, Igor [1 ]
Seager, Thomas P. [2 ]
机构
[1] USA, Corps Engineers, Engn Res & Dev Ctr, Concord, MA 01742 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Ctr Earth Syst Engn & Management, Sch Sustainable Engn & Built Environm, Ira A Fulton Sch Engn, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
关键词
LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; DECISION-MAKING;
D O I
10.1021/es102117k
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The unprecedented uncertainty associated with engineered nanomaterials greatly expands the need for research regarding their potential environmental consequences. However, decision-makers such as regulatory agencies, product developers, or other nanotechnology stakeholders may not find the results of such research directly informative of decisions intended to mitigate environmental risks. To help interpret research findings and prioritize new research needs, there is an acute need for structured decision-analytic aids that are operable in a context of extraordinary uncertainty. Whereas existing stochastic decision-analytic techniques explore uncertainty only in decision-maker preference information, this paper extends model uncertainty to technology performance. As an illustrative example, the framework is applied to the case of single-wall carbon nanotubes. Four different synthesis processes (arc, high pressure carbon monoxide, chemical vapor deposition, and laser) are compared based on five salient performance criteria. A probabilistic rank ordering of preferred processes is determined using outranking normalization and a linear-weighted sum for different weighting scenarios including completely unknown weights and four fixed-weight sets representing hypothetical stakeholder views. No single process pathway dominates under all weight scenarios, but it is likely that some inferior process technologies could be identified as low priorities for further research.
引用
收藏
页码:8704 / 8711
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Prioritization of sediment management alternatives using stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis [J].
Alvarez-Guerra, Manuel ;
Canis, Laure ;
Voulvoulis, Nikolaos ;
Viguri, Javier R. ;
Linkov, Igor .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 408 (20) :4354-4367
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, SCI DEC ADV RISK ASS, DOI DOI 10.17226/12209
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, PUBL US EPA
[4]  
Belton V., 2002, MULIPLE CRITERIA DEC
[5]   Use of risk assessment and life cycle assessment in decision making: A common policy research agenda [J].
Cowell, SJ ;
Fairman, R ;
Lofstedt, RE .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2002, 22 (05) :879-894
[6]  
DAVIS JM, 2007, J NANOSCI NANOTECHNO, P1
[7]   Toward green nano: E-factor analysis of several nanomaterial syntheses [J].
Eckelman, Matthew J. ;
Zimmerman, Julie B. ;
Anastas, Paul T. .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2008, 12 (03) :316-328
[8]  
Evans JS, 2002, RISK ANAL, V22, P819
[9]  
GANTER MJ, 2009, P 2009 IEEE INT S SU
[10]   Environmental assessment of single-walled carbon nanotube processes [J].
Healy, Meagan L. ;
Dahlben, Lindsay J. ;
Isaacs, Jacqueline A. .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2008, 12 (03) :376-393