Comparison of gemcitabine versus the matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor BAY 12-9566 in patients with advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: A phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group

被引:298
作者
Moore, MJ
Hamm, J
Dancey, J
Eisenberg, PD
Dagenais, M
Fields, A
Hagan, K
Greenberg, B
Colwell, B
Zee, B
Tu, D
Ottaway, J
Humphrey, R
Seymour, L
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Princess Margaret Hosp, Hlth Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] NCI, Canada Clin Trials Grp, Kingston, ON, Canada
[3] CHU Montreal Pavillon St Luc, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Cross Canc Inst, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada
[5] Nova Scotia Canc Ctr, Halifax, NS, Canada
[6] Alliant Hlth Syst, Louisville, KY USA
[7] Sutter Hlth Canc Res Ctr, Greenbrae, CA USA
[8] Hematol & Oncol Associates Virginia, Richmond, VA USA
[9] Univ Connecticut, Ctr Hlth, Farmington, CT USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2003.02.098
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose : To compare the selective matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor BAY 12-9566 with the nucleoside analog gemcitabine in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods: Patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma who had not previously received chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive BAY 12-9566 800 mg orally bid continuously or gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) administered intravenously on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43 for the first 8 weeks, and then days 1, 8, and 15 of each subsequent 28-day cycle. The primary end point was overall survival; secondary end points were progression-free survival, tumor response, quality of life, and clinical benefit. he planned sample size of the study was 350 patients. Two formal interim analyses were planned. Results: The study was closed to accrual after the second interim analysis on the basis of the recommendation of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Data Safety Monitoring Committee. There were 277 patients enrolled onto the study, 138 in the SAY 12-9566 arm and 139 in the gemcitabine arm. The rates of serious toxicity were low in both arms. The median survival for the BAY 12-9566 arm and the gemcitabine arm was 3.74 months and 6.59 months, respectively (P < .001; stratified log-rank test). The median progression-free survival for the BAY 12-9566 and gemcitabine arms was 1.68 and 3.5 months, respectively (P < .001). Quality-of-life analysis also favored gemcitabine. Conclusion: Gemcitabine is significantly superior to. BAY 12-9566 in advanced pancreatic cancer. (C) 2003 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:3296 / 3302
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER QLQ-C30 - A QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENT FOR USE IN INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL-TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY [J].
AARONSON, NK ;
AHMEDZAI, S ;
BERGMAN, B ;
BULLINGER, M ;
CULL, A ;
DUEZ, NJ ;
FILIBERTI, A ;
FLECHTNER, H ;
FLEISHMAN, SB ;
DEHAES, JCJM ;
KAASA, S ;
KLEE, M ;
OSOBA, D ;
RAZAVI, D ;
ROFE, PB ;
SCHRAUB, S ;
SNEEUW, K ;
SULLIVAN, M ;
TAKEDA, F .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (05) :365-376
[2]   Phase III study of gemcitabine in combination with fluorouracil versus gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial E2297 [J].
Berlin, JD ;
Catalano, P ;
Thomas, JP ;
Kugler, JW ;
Haller, DG ;
Benson, AB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (15) :3270-3275
[3]  
Bramhall SR, 1997, J PATHOL, V182, P347, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199707)182:3<347::AID-PATH848>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-J
[5]   A double-blind placebo-controlled, randomised study comparing gemcitabine and marimastat with gemcitabine and placebo as first line therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer [J].
Bramhall, SR ;
Schulz, J ;
Nemunaitis, J ;
Brown, PD ;
Baillet, M ;
Buckels, JAC .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 87 (02) :161-167
[6]   Marimastat as first-line therapy for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer: A randomized trial [J].
Bramhall, SR ;
Rosemurgy, A ;
Brown, PD ;
Bowry, C ;
Buckels, JAC .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (15) :3447-3455
[7]   ASSESSING THE RELIABILITY OF 2 TOXICITY SCALES - IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERPRETING TOXICITY DATA [J].
BRUNDAGE, MD ;
PATER, JL ;
ZEE, B .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (14) :1138-1148
[8]   Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: A randomized trial [J].
Burris, HA ;
Moore, MJ ;
Andersen, J ;
Green, MR ;
Rothenberg, ML ;
Madiano, MR ;
Cripps, MC ;
Portenoy, RK ;
Storniolo, AM ;
Tarassoff, P ;
Nelson, R ;
Dorr, FA ;
Stephens, CD ;
VanHoff, DD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (06) :2403-2413
[9]   Gemcitabine alone or with cisplatin for the treatment of patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic carcinoma - A prospective, randomized phase III study of the Gruppo Oncologico dell'Italia Meridionale [J].
Colucci, G ;
Giuliani, F ;
Gebbia, V ;
Biglietto, M ;
Rabitti, P ;
Uomo, G ;
Cigolari, S ;
Testa, A ;
Maiello, E ;
Lopez, M .
CANCER, 2002, 94 (04) :902-910
[10]   Phase I study of the matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, BAY 12-9566 [J].
Erlichman, C ;
Adjei, AA ;
Alberts, SR ;
Sloan, JA ;
Goldberg, RM ;
Pitot, HC ;
Rubin, J ;
Atherton, PJ ;
Klee, GG ;
Humphrey, R .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2001, 12 (03) :389-395