Unrepresentative information - The case of newspaper reporting on campaign finance

被引:31
作者
Ansolabehere, S
Snowberg, EC
Snyder, JM [1 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Grad Sch Business, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1093/poq/nfi022
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 [文学]; 0503 [新闻传播学];
摘要
This article examines evidence of sampling or statistical bias in newspaper reporting on campaign finance. We compile all stories from the five largest circulation newspapers in the United States that mention a dollar amount for campaign expenditures, contributions, or receipts from 1996 to 2000. We compare these figures to those recorded by the Federal Election Commission (FEC). The average figures reported in newspapers exceed the figures from the FEC by as much as eightfold. Press reports also focus excessively on corporate contributions and soft money, rather than on the more common types of donors-individual-and types of contributions-hard money. We further find that these biases are reflected in public perceptions of money in elections. Survey respondents overstate the amount of money raised and the share from different groups by roughly the amount found in newspapers, and better-educated people (those most likely to read newspapers) showed the greatest discrepancy between their beliefs and the facts.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 231
页数:19
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]
[Anonymous], WIRE TV
[2]
[Anonymous], 1997, What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters
[3]
Why is there so little money in US politics? [J].
Ansolabehere, S ;
de Figueiredo, JM ;
Snyder, JM .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2003, 17 (01) :105-130
[4]
[5]
*CONS FED AM, 2004, NEW SURV FINDS AM RE
[6]
Dorfman Lori., 2001, Off Balance: Youth, Race and Crime in the News
[7]
Hess S, 1991, LIVE CAPITOL HILL ST
[8]
HOLMAN C, 2002, BUYING TIME 2000
[9]
IYENGAR S, 1987, NEWS THAT MATTERS
[10]
Iyengar Shanto, 1992, IS ANYONE RESPONSIBL