Family variation for fall cold hardiness in two Washington populations of coastal Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var menziesii (Mirb) Franco)

被引:29
作者
Aitken, SN
Adams, WT
Schermann, N
Fuchigami, LH
机构
[1] INRA,CTR RECH ORLEANS,F-45160 OLIVET,FRANCE
[2] OREGON STATE UNIV,DEPT HORT,CORVALLIS,OR 97331
关键词
artificial freeze testing; genetic variation;
D O I
10.1016/0378-1127(95)03609-1
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
In order to assess the genetics of fall cold hardiness in coastal Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii (Mirb.) France), shoot cuttings were collected in October from saplings (9-year-old trees) of open-pollinated families in two progeny tests in each of two breeding zones in Washington, one in the Coast range (80 families) and one on the west slope of the Cascade Mountains (89 families). Samples from over 5500 trees were subjected to artificial freezing and visually evaluated for needle, stem and bud tissue injury. The extent to which cold injury is genetically related to tree height and shoot phenology (timing of bud burst and bud set) was also evaluated. Significant family variation was found for all cold hardiness traits; however, individual heritability estimates were relatively low (ranging from 0.09 to 0.22). Significant family-by-test site interaction was detected for needle injury in the Cascade breeding zone, but not in the coastal zone. Genetic correlations (r(A)) among needle, stem and bud tissues for cold damage were weak (0.16 less than or equal to r(A) less than or equal to 0.58) indicating that genes controlling fall hardening are somewhat different for different tissues. Timing of bud burst and bud set were only weakly correlated with cold injury (r(A) less than or equal to 0.49). Thus, bud phenology is a poor predictor of fall cold hardiness in this species. There was no consistent relationship between tree height and cold injury in the coastal zone. In the Cascade zone, taller trees appeared to be more susceptible to cold injury, but the association was weak (mean r(A) = 0.38, range 0.20-0.72).
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 195
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
ADAMS W T, 1990, Western Journal of Applied Forestry, V5, P135
[2]  
AITKEN SN, 1995, FEB P CRC IUFRO C HO, P321
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1984, MANUAL QUANTITATIVE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1988, SAS STAT USERS GUIDE
[5]  
BURDON RD, 1977, SILVAE GENET, V26, P168
[6]   COMPARISON OF 3 COLD HARDINESS TESTS FOR CONIFER SEEDLINGS [J].
BURR, KE ;
TINUS, RW ;
WALLNER, SJ ;
KING, RM .
TREE PHYSIOLOGY, 1990, 6 (04) :351-369
[7]   RELATIONSHIPS AMONG COLD HARDINESS, ROOT-GROWTH POTENTIAL AND BUD DORMANCY IN 3 CONIFERS [J].
BURR, KE ;
TINUS, RW ;
WALLNER, SJ ;
KING, RM .
TREE PHYSIOLOGY, 1989, 5 (03) :291-306
[8]   THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN LIVING AND DEAD PLANT-TISSUE VIABILITY TESTS IN COLD HARDINESS RESEARCH [J].
CALKINS, JB ;
SWANSON, BT .
CRYOBIOLOGY, 1990, 27 (02) :194-211
[9]   GENECOLOGY OF DOUGLAS-FIR IN A WATERSHED IN THE OREGON CASCADES [J].
CAMPBELL, RK .
ECOLOGY, 1979, 60 (05) :1036-1050
[10]  
DUFFIELD JW, 1956, USDA129 PNW FOR RANG