Do individual perceptions of group cohesion reflect shared beliefs? - An empirical analysis

被引:42
作者
Carron, AV [1 ]
Brawley, LR
Eys, MA
Bray, S
Dorsch, K
Estabrooks, P
Hall, CR
Hardy, J
Hausenblas, H
Madison, R
Paskevich, D
Patterson, MM
Prapavessis, H
Spink, KS
Terry, PC
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Sch Kinesiol, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
[2] Univ Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[3] Univ Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada
[4] Univ Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB T1K 3M4, Canada
[5] Kansas State Univ, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[6] Univ Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[7] Univ Auckland, Auckland 1, New Zealand
[8] Univ Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[9] Univ Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0W0, Canada
[10] Univ So Queensland, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
关键词
task type; consensus; sport teams; Group Environment Questionnaire;
D O I
10.1177/1046496403254274
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This study's primary purpose was to examine the degree to which individual perceptions of cohesiveness reflect shared beliefs in sport teams. The secondary purposes were to examine how the type of cohesion, the task interactive nature of the group, and the absolute level of cohesion relate to the index of agreement. Teams (n = 192 containing 2,10 7 athletes) were tested on the Group Environment Questionnaire. Index of agreement values were greater for the group integration (GI) manifestations of cohesiveness (GI-lask, r(wg(j)) = .721; GI-social, r(wg(j)) = .694) than for the individual attractions to the group (ATG) manifestations (ATG-task, r(wg(j)) = .621; ATG-social, r(wg(j)) = .563). No differences were found for interactive versus coactive/independent sport teams. A positive relationship was observed between the absolute level of cohesiveness and the index of agreement. Results were discussed in terms of their implication for the aggregation of individual perceptions of cohesion to represent the group construct.
引用
收藏
页码:468 / 496
页数:29
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1979, The social psychology of organzing
[2]   COHESIVENESS WITHOUT GROUPTHINK - THE INTERACTIVE EFFECTS OF SOCIAL AND TASK COHESION [J].
BERNTHAL, PR ;
INSKO, CA .
GROUP & ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT, 1993, 18 (01) :66-87
[3]   PERCEIVED COHESION - A CONCEPTUAL AND EMPIRICAL-EXAMINATION [J].
BOLLEN, KA ;
HOYLE, RH .
SOCIAL FORCES, 1990, 69 (02) :479-504
[4]   ASSESSING THE COHESION OF TEAMS - VALIDITY OF THE GROUP ENVIRONMENT QUESTIONNAIRE [J].
BRAWLEY, LR ;
CARRON, AV ;
WIDMEYER, WN .
JOURNAL OF SPORT PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 9 (03) :275-294
[5]  
Carron A.V., 1998, ADV SPORT EXERCISE P, P213
[6]   GROUP COHESION AND INDIVIDUAL ADHERENCE TO PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY [J].
CARRON, AV ;
WIDMEYER, WN ;
BRAWLEY, LR .
JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 10 (02) :127-138
[7]   THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN INSTRUMENT TO ASSESS COHESION IN SPORT TEAMS - THE GROUP ENVIRONMENT QUESTIONNAIRE [J].
CARRON, AV ;
WIDMEYER, WN ;
BRAWLEY, LR .
JOURNAL OF SPORT PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 7 (03) :244-266
[8]   Cohesion - Conceptual and measurement issues [J].
Carron, AV ;
Brawley, LR .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 2000, 31 (01) :89-106
[9]   Team cohesion and team success in sport [J].
Carron, AV ;
Bray, SR ;
Eys, MA .
JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2002, 20 (02) :119-126
[10]   Cohesion and performance in sport: A meta analysis [J].
Carron, AV ;
Colman, MM ;
Wheeler, J ;
Stevens, D .
JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 24 (02) :168-188