Fluoroscopic guided implantation of central venous brachial ports by radiologists.

被引:12
作者
Lenhart, M [1 ]
Chegini, M
Gmeinwieser, J
Manke, C
Feuerbach, S
机构
[1] Klinikum Univ Regensburg, Inst Rontgendiagnost, D-93042 Regensburg, Germany
[2] Klinikum Univ Regensburg, Klin & Poliklin Strahlentherapie, D-93042 Regensburg, Germany
来源
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN | 1998年 / 169卷 / 02期
关键词
catheters and catheterisation; central venous access and technology; interventional procedures; complications; chemotherapy; central venous access;
D O I
10.1055/s-2007-1015072
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100207 [影像医学与核医学]; 1009 [特种医学];
摘要
Purpose: To assess the safety and effectiveness of fluoroscopic guided brachial implanted central-venous miniport systems. Patients and methods: In 32 oncological patients a central-venous miniport system (Vital-Port(TM), CPC-Cook) was implanted in the forearm. The group included 15 women and 17 men (range 33-78, mean 56 years). Results: Technical success was 100%, in 6 patients vasospasm produced difficulties in catheter placement. In a total of 2878 patients days (range 3-445, mean 90 days) 5 complications occurred (15.6%,1.7 on 1,000 catheterdays): In one patient (3.13%, 0.35/1000d) the system was changed due to leakage of the catheter near the chamber. Four patients had minor complications: in one case excision of a suture line granuloma was necessary, one haematoma at the site of the chamber was treated with dressing, one patient had a wound dehiscence and one occluded catheter returned to patency by flushing the system with contrast material. Venous thrombosis, phlebitis, catheter dislocation, paravasation or system-related infection did not occur. Conclusion: Fluoroscopic guided peripheral central-venous port implantation is a safe and easy procedure with a high success rate and a low complication rate which can be performed in an outpatient setting.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 194
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]
THE UPPER ARM APPROACH FOR PLACEMENT OF PERIPHERALLY INSERTED CENTRAL CATHETERS FOR PROTRACTED VENOUS ACCESS [J].
ANDREWS, JC ;
MARX, MV ;
WILLIAMS, DM ;
SPROAT, I ;
WALKERANDREWS, SC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1992, 158 (02) :427-429
[2]
Long-term femoral vein central venous access in cancer patients [J].
Bertoglio, S ;
DiSomma, C ;
Meszaros, P ;
Gipponi, M ;
Cafiero, F ;
Percivale, P .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 22 (02) :162-165
[3]
IMPLANTATION OF PAS PORT VENOUS ACCESS DEVICE IN THE FOREARM UNDER FLUOROSCOPIC GUIDANCE [J].
BRANTZAWADZKI, M ;
ANTHONY, M ;
MERCER, EC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1993, 160 (05) :1127-1128
[4]
BROTHERS TE, 1988, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V166, P295
[5]
LONG-TERM CIRCULATORY ACCESS VIA A PERIPHERAL IMPLANTABLE PORT [J].
CAREY, PC ;
MANN, DV ;
PEARCE, SZ ;
WINDSOR, ACJ ;
PULLYBLANK, AM ;
GUILLOU, PJ ;
MONSON, JRT .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 80 (05) :600-601
[6]
CENTRAL VENOUS BRACHIAL CATHETER (PAS PORT TM) AND CATHETER SCANNING SYSTEM (CATH-FINDER TM) [J].
CARRE, MC ;
VEGA, JML ;
CARLES, J ;
LIZON, J ;
VILLAR, A ;
LERA, SA ;
ALASTRUE, A ;
RULL, M ;
VANDERHOSSLADT, C ;
AGUILO, J ;
DIAZRUBIO, E ;
ROSELL, R .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1994, 55 (03) :190-193
[7]
Subcutaneous ports in the radiology suite: An effective and safe procedure for care in cancer patients [J].
deGregorio, MA ;
Miguelena, JM ;
Fernandez, JA ;
deGregorio, C ;
Tres, A ;
Alfonso, ER .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 1996, 6 (05) :748-752
[8]
A COST-EFFECTIVE PERIPHERAL VENOUS PORT SYSTEM PLACED AT THE BEDSIDE [J].
FINNEY, R ;
ALBRINK, MH ;
HART, MB ;
ROSEMURGY, AS .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 1992, 53 (01) :17-19
[9]
COMPARISON OF A TOTALLY IMPLANTABLE ACCESS DEVICE FOR CHEMOTHERAPY (PORT-A-CATH) AND LONG-TERM PERCUTANEOUS CATHETERIZATION (BROVIAC) [J].
GREENE, FL ;
MOORE, W ;
STRICKLAND, G ;
MCFARLAND, J .
SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1988, 81 (05) :580-583
[10]
Haindl H, 1989, REG CANCER TREAT, V2, P238