Double-blind randomized trial of tramadol for the treatment of the pain of diabetic neuropathy

被引:380
作者
Harati, Y
Gooch, C
Swenson, M
Edelman, S
Greene, D
Raskin, P
Donofrio, P
Cornblath, D
Sachdeo, R
Siu, CO
Kamin, M
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Neurol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
[4] Univ Calif San Diego, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[6] Univ Texas, SW Med Ctr, Dallas, TX USA
[7] Wake Forest Univ, Bowman Gray Sch Med, Winston Salem, NC USA
[8] Johns Hopkins Hosp, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[9] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[10] OrthoMcNeil Pharmaceut, Raritan, NJ USA
关键词
D O I
10.1212/WNL.50.6.1842
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tramadol in treating the pain of diabetic neuropathy. Background: The pain of diabetic neuropathy is a major cause of morbidity among these patients and treatment, as with other small-fiber neuropathies, is often unsatisfactory. Tramadol is a centrally acting analgesic for use in treating moderate to moderately severe pain. Methods: This multicenter, outpatient, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study consisted of a washout/screening phase, during which all analgesics were discontinued, and a 42-day double-blind treatment phase. A total of 131 patients with painful diabetic neuropathy were treated with tramadol (n = 65) or placebo (n = 66) tramadol, which were administered as identical capsules in divided doses four times daily. The primary efficacy analysis compared the mean pain intensity scores in the tramadol and placebo groups obtained at day 42 of the study or at the time of discontinuation. Secondary efficacy assessments were the pain relief rating scores and a quality of life evaluation based on daily activities and sleep characteristics. Results: Tramadol, at an average dosage of 210 mg/day, was significantly (p < 0.001) more effective than placebo for treating the pain of diabetic neuropathy. Patients in the tramadol group scored significantly better in physical (p = 0.02) and social functioning(p = 0.04) ratings than patients in the placebo group. No statistically significant treatment effects on sleep were identified. The most frequently occurring adverse events with tramadol were nausea, constipation, headache, and somnolence. Conclusions: The results of this placebo-controlled trial showed that tramadol was effective and safe in treating the pain of diabetic neuropathy.
引用
收藏
页码:1842 / 1846
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Barth H, 1987, PAIN S, V30, pS231, DOI 10.1016/0304-3959(87)91523-5
  • [2] DIABETIC PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY - NERVE-CONDUCTION STUDIES BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER CARBAMAZEPINE THERAPY
    CHAKRABARTI, AK
    SAMANTARAY, SK
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1976, 6 (06): : 565 - 568
  • [3] EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF NONSTEROIDAL ANTIINFLAMMATORY DRUGS IN THE THERAPY OF DIABETIC NEUROPATHY
    COHEN, KL
    HARRIS, S
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1987, 147 (08) : 1442 - 1444
  • [4] DONOFRIO P, 1991, ARCH INTERN MED, V151, P2225
  • [5] FLOHE L, 1978, ARZNEIMITTEL-FORSCH, V28-1, P213
  • [6] DIABETIC PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHIES
    HARATI, Y
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1987, 107 (04) : 546 - 559
  • [7] Diabetes and the nervous system
    Harati, Y
    [J]. ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1996, 25 (02) : 325 - +
  • [8] EFFECTS OF DESIPRAMINE, AMITRIPTYLINE, AND FLUOXETINE ON PAIN IN DIABETIC NEUROPATHY
    MAX, MB
    LYNCH, SA
    MUIR, J
    SHOAF, SE
    SMOLLER, B
    DUBNER, R
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 326 (19) : 1250 - 1256
  • [9] AMITRIPTYLINE RELIEVES DIABETIC NEUROPATHY PAIN IN PATIENTS WITH NORMAL OR DEPRESSED MOOD
    MAX, MB
    CULNANE, M
    SCHAFER, SC
    GRACELY, RH
    WALTHER, DJ
    SMOLLER, B
    DUBNER, R
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 1987, 37 (04) : 589 - 596
  • [10] Pirart J., 1978, DIABETES CARE, V1, P168, DOI DOI 10.2337/DIACARE.1.3.168