Sustainable Development and Energy Security Level After Ignalina NPP Shutdown

被引:35
作者
Augutis, Juozas [1 ,2 ]
Krikstolaitis, Ricardas [1 ,2 ]
Peciulyte, Sigita [1 ]
Konstantinaviciute, Inga [3 ]
机构
[1] Vytautas Magnus Univ, Dept Math & Stat, LT-44404 Kaunas, Lithuania
[2] Lithuanian Energy Inst, Lab Nucl Installat Safety, LT-44403 Kaunas, Lithuania
[3] Lithuanian Energy Inst, Lab Energy Syst Res, LT-44403 Kaunas, Lithuania
关键词
energy security; security level; system of indicators; Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant (NPP); electricity generating costs; sustainable development; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.3846/13928619.2011.553930
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The paper presents the investigation of the impact of Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) shutdown on Lithuanian energy security. The system of energy security indicators, covering technical, economic and socio-political aspects is presented. The integral characteristic of these indicators shows the level of energy security. The paper analyses the Lithuanian energy security level in 2007. To make a comparison, the energy security level in 2010, after the shutdown of Ignalina NPP, when Lithuanian Power Plant in Elektrenai becomes the main electricity producer, is forecasted. Two alternatives are analysed: Lithuanian Power Plant uses either gas or heavy fuel oil for electricity production. The security level of each indicator, each indicator block and the total security level are presented as the result. Energy security indicators, which increased or decreased after the shutdown of Ignalina NPP, are analysed, including the indicators which have had the greatest impact on the change in energy security level. The influence of Ignalina NPP shutdown on CO2 emissions is presented. Also, electricity generating costs for different types of electricity production at a different discount rate are presented.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 21
页数:17
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Nuclear power for sustainable development: Current status and future prospects
    Adamantiades, A.
    Kessides, I.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (12) : 5149 - 5166
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2007, NATL ENERGY STRATEGY
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1977, GEN EQUILIBRIUM MODE
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2008, UK EN SECT IND 2008
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2010, PROJ COSTS GEN EL
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1998, KYOTO PROTOCOL UN FR
  • [7] Augutis Juozas, 2008, Energetika, V54, P1
  • [8] Augutis J, 2009, SAFETY, RELIABILITY AND RISK ANALYSIS: THEORY, METHODS AND APPLICATIONS, VOLS 1-4, P2575
  • [9] Geopolitics of European natural gas demand: Supplies from Russia, Caspian and the Middle East
    Bilgin, Mert
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (11) : 4482 - 4492
  • [10] Bonser D., 2002, ANN S 2002 WORLD NUC